The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1653-1655.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.03005eth
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Betsy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Betsy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rhodes, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ethics in Practice
Right arrow Ethics
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

The Human Form

Accepting the Prioritization of Patient Values

Michael Betsy, MD1, James D. Capozzi, MD2 and Rosamond Rhodes, PhD3

1 Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 5 East 98th Street, New York, NY 10029
2 Departments of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, 1065 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10128. E-mail address for J.D. Capozzi: capoz5{at}aol.com
3 Department of Bioethics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029-6574

A seventeen-year-old boy who had had a subtotal femoral reconstruction because of an osteosarcoma in the left femur, and a subsequent revision for hardware failure, was again having severe pain secondary to failure of the endoprosthesis. The patient's original orthopaedic oncologist, who had performed both previous operations, recommended that the patient have an above-the-knee amputation. The patient and his parents inquired about the Van Nes rotationplasty. They were told directly that it was an antiquated procedure that was not done anymore. The prosthetist with whom they were working gave them the name of an orthopaedic oncologist who could perform the Van Nes procedure. They traveled 850 miles for a consultation, and the patient underwent the procedure.

Several months after the operation, the patient walked with a slight limp and looked like a perfectly normal teenager in a pair of jeans. On examination, he had a well-fitted below-the-knee prosthesis attached to his foot, which was in nearly 160° of what was essentially plantar flexion, perfectly matching the attitude of a knee as it couples to a below-the-knee prosthesis. The boy and his parents, who had decided months earlier to opt for an uncommonly performed procedure that would give him a chance at a "normal" appearing and functioning limb, deemed the surgery a complete success with an "excellent" outcome.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?