The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1542-1550.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02882
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
 CME 3: July, August, September 2005
Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 15: Fall 2005
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, N.
Right arrow Articles by Engh, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kitamura, N.
Right arrow Articles by Engh, C. A., Sr.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Hip
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diagnostic Features of Pelvic Osteolysis on Computed Tomography: The Importance of Communication Pathways

Nobuto Kitamura, MD1, Douglas D.R. Naudie, MD, FRCSC2, Serena B. Leung, MS1, Robert H. Hopper, Jr., PhD1 and Charles A. Engh, Sr., MD1

1 Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, P.O. Box 7088, Alexandria, VA 22307. E-mail address for N. Kitamura: nobukita{at}aol.com
2 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre-University Campus, University of Western Ontario, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada

Investigation performed at the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute, Alexandria, Virginia

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

Background: Progressive periacetabular osteolysis following total hip arthroplasty may require revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to use computed tomography scans of hemipelves retrieved at autopsy from patients who had had a total hip arthroplasty, to define the radiographic characteristics that differentiate clinically important osteolytic lesions from osteoarthritic bone cysts.

Methods: We analyzed forty-four hemipelves that had been retrieved at autopsy at a mean of eight years after a total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented acetabular component. Computed tomography images were analyzed to identify the location, volume, and presence of cortical erosion and/or communication pathways with the joint space for all periacetabular bone defects. Lesions that were not present on preoperative or immediate postoperative plain radiographs were defined as new lesions. These new lesions were compared with those that were present on preoperative or immediate postoperative plain radiographs, which were defined as preexisting lesions.

Results: Forty-six lesions were identified on computed tomography, and sixteen of them were preexisting lesions. The mean volume of the preexisting lesions was 1.5 ± 1.5 cm3, which was significantly smaller than the mean volume of 5.6 ± 11.4 cm3 of the thirty new lesions (p = 0.034). Twenty-eight of the thirty new lesions had a clear communication pathway with the joint space, while thirteen of the sixteen preexisting lesions demonstrated no communication pathway. New lesions were significantly more likely to communicate with the joint space than were preexisting lesions (p < 0.001). Cortical erosion was seen in sixteen of the thirty new lesions; none of the sixteen preexisting lesions exhibited cortical erosion (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The most important difference between osteolytic lesions and preexisting bone defects was the presence of a communication pathway to the joint space. Lesions that did not have an identifiable communication to the joint space were smaller and were not associated with cortical erosion. Lesions with communication to the joint through multiple pathways or through a central dome hole were larger and more likely to be associated with cortical erosion.

Clinical Relevance: Periacetabular lesions that are not present on perioperative plain radiographs and that have a communication pathway with the joint space and associated cortical erosions as seen on computed tomography are likely to be osteolytic lesions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RadioGraphicsHome page
R. H. Choplin, C. N. Henley, E. M. Edds, W. Capello, J. L. Rankin, and K. A. Buckwalter
Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Bone Deficiency of the Acetabulum
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2008; 28(3): 771 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]