The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1438-1445.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02422
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty
A Meta-Analysis
Emilios E. Pakos, MD1,
Evangelia E. Ntzani, MD1 and
Thomas A. Trikalinos, MD1
1 Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based Medicine Unit, Department of Hygiene and
Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, University Campus,
45110 Ioannina, Greece. E-mail address for E.E. Pakos:
me00911{at}cc.uoi.gr.
E-mail address for E.E. Ntzani:
entzani{at}hotmail.com.
E-mail address for T.A. Trikalinos:
ttrikalin{at}mac.com
Investigation performed at the Clinical Trials and Evidence-Based
Medicine Unit, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina
School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece, and the Institute for Clinical Research
and Health Policy Studies, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Tufts University
School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
NOTE: The authors thank Drs. J.H. Newman, J. Kordelle, and J.A.
Feller for providing additional data for the present study.
Background: Patellar resurfacing during total knee arthroplasty
remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this
technique through an evaluation of the current literature.
Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled
trials comparing total knee arthroplasties performed with and without patellar
resurfacing. Outcomes of interest included the number of reoperations, the
prevalence of postoperative anterior knee pain, and the improvement in various
knee scores.
Results: Ten trials assessing 1223 knees were eligible. The absolute
risk of reoperation was reduced by 4.6% (95% confidence interval, 1.9% to
7.3%) in the patellar resurfacing arm (between-study heterogeneity, p <
0.01; I2 = 60%), implying that one would have to resurface
twenty-two patellae (95% confidence interval, fourteen to fifty-two patellae)
in order to prevent one reoperation. Patellar resurfacing reduced the absolute
risk of postoperative anterior knee pain by 13.8% (95% confidence interval,
6.4% to 21.2%), implying that one would have to resurface seven patellae (95%
confidence interval, five to sixteen patellae) in order to prevent one case of
postoperative anterior knee pain. Only four trials provided adequate data for
a quantitative synthesis of the changes in the various knee scores; on the
basis of those four trials, there was no difference in the mean improvement in
the knee scores (standardized mean difference, 0.03; 95% confidence interval,
-0.50 to 0.56).
Conclusions: The available evidence indicates that patellar
resurfacing reduces the risks of reoperation and anterior knee pain after
total knee arthroplasty. The observed effects are clinically important despite
their modest magnitude. Additional, carefully designed randomized trials are
required to strengthen this claim.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Alan C. Merchant, M.D.
- JBJS Online, 17 Aug 2005
[Full text]
- Patellar Resurfacing in Total Knee Arthroplasty
- Vasudev P. Shanbhag, et al.
- JBJS Online, 22 Aug 2005
[Full text]
- Meta analysis of patellar resurfacing
- Mohammad H. Malik, et al.
- JBJS Online, 23 Aug 2005
[Full text]
- Dr Trikalinos et al respond to Drs Malik and Porter
- Thomas A. Trikalinos, et al.
- JBJS Online, 23 Aug 2005
[Full text]
|