The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1284-1292.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.C.00947
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
 Shoulder/Elbow Test 11: Summer 2005
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thornhill, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Thornhill, T. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Uncemented Glenoid Component in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Survivorship and Outcomes

Scott David Martin, MD1, David Zurakowski, PhD2 and Thomas S. Thornhill, MD1

1 Department of Orthopedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address for S.D. Martin: sdmartin{at}partners.org
2 Department of Orthopedics and Biostatistics, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Background: Glenoid component loosening continues to be a major factor affecting the long-term survivorship of total shoulder replacements. Radiolucent lines, cement fracture, migration, and loosening requiring revision are common problems with cemented glenoid components. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented glenoid component and to identify predictors of glenoid component failure.

Methods: One hundred and forty-seven consecutive total shoulder arthroplasties were performed in 132 patients (mean age, 63.3 years) with use of an uncemented glenoid component fixed with screws between 1988 and 1996. One hundred and forty shoulders in 124 patients were available for follow-up at an average of 7.5 years. One shoulder in which the arthroplasty had failed at 2.4 years and for which the duration of follow-up was four years was also included for completeness. The preoperative diagnoses included osteoarthritis in seventy-two shoulders and rheumatoid arthritis in fifty-five.

Results: Radiolucency was noted around the glenoid component and/or screws in fifty-three of the 140 shoulders. The mean modified ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons) score (and standard deviation) improved from 15.6 ± 11.8 points preoperatively to 75.8 ± 17.5 points at the time of follow-up. Eighty-five shoulders were not painful, forty-two were slightly or mildly painful, ten were moderately painful, and three were severely painful. Fifteen (11%) of the glenoid components failed clinically, and ten of them also had radiographic signs of failure. Eleven other shoulders had radiographic signs of failure but no symptoms at the time of writing. Three factors had a significant independent association with clinical failure: male gender (p = 0.02), pain (p < 0.01), and radiolucency adjacent to the flat tray (p < 0.001). In addition, the annual risk of implant revision was nearly seven times higher for patients with radiographic signs of failure. Clinical survivorship was 95% at five years and 85% at ten years.

Conclusions: The failure rates of the total shoulder arthroplasties in this study were higher than those in previously reported studies of cemented polyethylene components with similar durations of follow-up. Screw breakage and excessive polyethylene wear were common problems that may lead to additional failures of these uncemented glenoid components in the future.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
F. A. Matsen III, J. Clinton, J. Lynch, A. Bertelsen, and M. L. Richardson
Glenoid Component Failure in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2008; 90(4): 885 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. J. Scalise and J. P. Iannotti
Glenohumeral Arthrodesis After Failed Prosthetic Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2008; 90(1): 70 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
E. V. Cheung, J. W. Sperling, and R. H. Cofield
Reimplantation of a Glenoid Component Following Component Removal and Allogenic Bone-Grafting
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1777 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. I. Bohsali, M. A. Wirth, and C. A. Rockwood Jr.
Complications of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2006; 88(10): 2279 - 2292.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 562 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]