The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:1185-1190.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02228
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Orthopaedic Surgeons Do Not Increase Surgical Volume After Investing in a Specialty Hospital
G. William Woods, MD1,
Daniel P. O'Connor, PhD1 and
Peggy Pierce, BBA1
1 Fondren Orthopedic Group LLP (G.W.W. and P.P.), and Joe W. King Orthopedic
Institute (G.W.W. and D.P.O'C.), Texas Orthopedic Hospital, 7401 South Main
Street, Houston, TX 77030-4509. E-mail address for D.P.O'C.:
info{at}jwkoi.com
Investigation performed at the Fondren Orthopedic Group and the Joe W.
King Orthopedic Institute, Houston, Texas
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article,
on our web site
(www.jbjs.org)
and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at
781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
Background: The number of surgical specialty hospitals with
physician investors in the United States has increased in the last ten years.
Opponents to these hospitals have argued that surgeon investors will perform
more surgery in order to maintain the hospital's profitability. The purpose of
the present study was to determine whether the surgical volume or the surgical
rate increased for a group of ten orthopaedic surgeons after the opening of an
orthopaedic surgery specialty hospital in which they held a financial
interest.
Methods: We analyzed the practice data for ten orthopaedic surgeons
during an interval spanning seven years before and eight years after the
opening of an orthopaedic surgery specialty hospital in which they held a
financial interest. The average rates of change in the number of surgical
procedures per year for each period were computed and compared with use of
regression analysis. The percentages of patients who underwent surgery before
and after the opening of the specialty hospital were also compared.
Results: The ten orthopaedic surgeons did not increase their
surgical volume or surgical rate after the specialty hospital opened. The ten
surgeons performed an average of 4399 surgical procedures per year before the
hospital opened and 4542 surgical procedures per year after the hospital
opened. The rate of change in the number of surgical procedures per year (19.1
compared with 8.9 procedures per year) did not increase after the specialty
hospital opened. The annual patient volume (16,019 compared with 15,982
patients) and the percentage of patients who underwent surgery (27.5% compared
with 28.4%) did not significantly change after the specialty hospital
opened.
Conclusions: The opening of an orthopaedic surgery specialty
hospital did not increase the surgical volume or the surgical rate for ten
orthopaedic surgeons who held a financial interest in the facility.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Other Factors Influencing Surgical Volume
- Senthil Nathan Sambandam, et al.
- JBJS Online, 20 Jun 2005
[Full text]
- Dr. O'Connor et al respond to Drs. Sambandam and Gul
- Daniel P. O'Connor, et al.
- JBJS Online, 28 Jun 2005
[Full text]
|