The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:999-1006.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.C.00568
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Results of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at a Minimum of Ten Years of Follow-up
Richard A. Berger, MD1,
R. Michael Meneghini, MD1,
Joshua J. Jacobs, MD1,
Mitchell B. Sheinkop, MD1,
Craig J. Della Valle, MD1,
Aaron G. Rosenberg, MD1 and
Jorge O. Galante, MD1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush Medical College, Rush-Presbyterian-St.
Luke's Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL
60612. E-mail address for R.A. Berger:
r.a.berger{at}sbcglobal.net
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush
Medical College, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago,
Illinois
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from Zimmer. In addition,
one or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment
or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Zimmer). Also,
a commercial entity (Zimmer) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct,
benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other
charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or
associated.
Background: There is a renewed interest in unicompartmental knee
arthroplasty. The present report describes the minimum ten-year results
associated with a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty design that is in current
use.
Methods: Sixty-two consecutive unicompartmental knee arthroplasties
that were performed with cemented modular Miller-Galante implants in fifty-one
patients were studied prospectively both clinically and radiographically. All
patients had isolated unicompartmental disease without patellofemoral
symptoms. No patient was lost to follow-up. Thirteen patients (thirteen knees)
died after less than ten years of follow-up, leaving thirty-eight patients
(forty-nine knees) with a minimum of ten years of follow-up. The average
duration of follow-up was twelve years.
Results: The mean Hospital for Special Surgery knee score improved
from 55 points preoperatively to 92 points at the time of the final follow-up.
Thirty-nine knees (80%) had an excellent result, six (12%) had a good result,
and four (8%) had a fair result. At the time of the final follow-up,
thirty-nine knees (80%) had flexion to at least 120°. Two patients (two
knees) with well-fixed components underwent revision to total knee
arthroplasty, at seven and eleven years, because of progression of
patellofemoral arthritis. At the time of the final follow-up, no component was
loose radiographically and there was no evidence of periprosthetic osteolysis.
Radiographic evidence of progressive loss of joint space was observed in the
opposite compartment of nine knees (18%) and in the patellofemoral space of
seven knees (14%). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a survival rate of 98.0%
± 2.0% at ten years and of 95.7% ± 4.3% at thirteen years, with
revision or radiographic loosening as the end point. The survival rate was
100% at thirteen years with aseptic loosening as the end point.
Conclusions: After a minimum duration of follow-up of ten years,
this cemented modular unicompartmental knee design was associated with
excellent clinical and radiographic results. Although the ten-year survival
rate was excellent, radiographic signs of progression of osteoarthritis in the
other compartments continued at a slow rate. With appropriate indications and
technique, this unicompartmental knee design can yield excellent results into
the beginning of the second decade of use.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Borus and T. Thornhill
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
January 1, 2008;
16(1):
9 - 18.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Farag, A. Ship, and J. H. Lonner
A 57-Year-Old Man With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
JAMA,
November 7, 2007;
298(17):
2055 - 2056.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. P. Sah and R. D. Scott
Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Through a Medial Approach. Study with an Average Five-Year Follow-up
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2007;
89(9):
1948 - 1954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Collier, C. A. Engh Jr., J. P. McAuley, and G. A. Engh
Factors Associated with the Loss of Thickness of Polyethylene Tibial Bearings After Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2007;
89(6):
1306 - 1314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. G. Myers, Q. Cui, M. Kuskowski, W. M. Mihalko, and K. J. Saleh
Outcomes of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Secondary and Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Knee
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(suppl_3):
76 - 82.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. F. Soohoo, H. Sharifi, G. Kominski, and J. R. Lieberman
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty as an Alternative to Total Knee Arthroplasty for Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2006;
88(9):
1975 - 1982.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Archibeck and R. E. White Jr.
What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2006;
88(7):
1677 - 1686.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Concern Regarding Duplicate Publications
- James D. Heckman, M.D., et al.
- JBJS Online, 30 Aug 2006
[Full text]
|