This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the activities for this article: Shoulder/Elbow Test 10: Summer 2005 CME 2: April, May, June 2005 [Supplementary Material] Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bishop, J. Y. Articles by Flatow, E. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bishop, J. Y. Articles by Flatow, E. L. Related Collections Sports Pain Management Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Interscalene Regional Anesthesia for Shoulder Surgery

¹ Columbus Bone, Joint and Hand Surgeons, Inc., 815 West Broad Street, Columbus, OH 43222
² The Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics (M.S., J. Gelber, J. Gladstone, and E.L.F.), Box 1188, and Department of Anesthesiology (M.K. and M.A.R.), Box 1010, Mount Sinai Hospital, 5 East 98th Street, New York, NY 10029. E-mail address for E.L. Flatow: evan.flatow{at}msnyuhealth.org

Investigation performed at the Leni and Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 568 consecutive patients who had shoulder surgery under interscalene regional block in a tertiary-care, university-based practice with an anesthesiology residency program. The blocks were performed by a group of anesthesiologists who were dedicated to the concept of regional anesthesia in their practice. Complete anesthetic and orthopaedic records were available for 547 patients. The surgical procedure, planned type of anesthesia, occurrence of block failure, and the presence of complications were noted.

Results: Of the 547 patients, 295 underwent an arthroscopic procedure and 252 (including eighty who had an arthroplasty) underwent an open procedure. General anesthesia was the initial planned choice for sixty-nine patients because of the complexity or duration of the procedure, the anatomic location, or patient insistence. Thirty-four of the sixty-nine patients also received an interscalene regional block. Interscalene regional block alone was planned for 478 patients. A total of 462 patients (97%) had a successful block whereas sixteen required general anesthesia because the block was inadequate. The success of the block was independent of the type or length of the surgery. No patient had a seizure, pneumothorax, cardiac event, or other major complication. Twelve (2.3%) of the 512 patients who had a block had minor complications, which included sensory neuropathy in eleven patients and a complex regional pain syndrome that resolved at three months in one patient. For ten of the eleven patients, the neuropathy had resolved by six months.

Conclusions: Interscalene regional block provides effective anesthesia for most types of shoulder surgery, including arthroplasty and fracture fixation. When administered by an anesthesiologist committed to and skilled in the technique, the block has an excellent rate of success and is associated with a relatively low complication rate.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Jafari, A. I. Kalstein, H. M. Nasrullah, M. Hedayatnia, J. M. Yarmush, and J. SchianodiCola A Randomized, Prospective, Double-Blind Trial Comparing 3% Chloroprocaine Followed by 0.5% Bupivacaine to 2% Lidocaine Followed by 0.5% Bupivacaine for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2008; 107(5): 1746 - 1750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Sisco and G. A. Dumanian Anterior Interosseous Nerve Syndrome Following Shoulder Arthroscopy. A Report of Three Cases J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 392 - 395. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Gerber, S. D. Pennington, E. H. Yian, C. A.W. Pfirrmann, C. M.L. Werner, and M. A. Zumstein Lesser Tuberosity Osteotomy for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Surgical Technique J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(1_suppl_2): 170 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Hadzic Is Regional Anesthesia Really Better than General Anesthesia? Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2005; 101(6): 1631 - 1633. [Full Text] [PDF]

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2005 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.