The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:583-591.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.01966
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
 Shoulder/Elbow Test 8: Spring 2005
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bradnock, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Bradnock, B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Thermal Tissue Damage Caused by Ultrasonic Cement Removal from the Humerus

Steven H. Goldberg, MD1, Mark S. Cohen, MD1, Michael Young, PHD, MSC2 and Brian Bradnock, FRCS(ED), FRCS(ORTH)3

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Parkway, 1471 Jelke, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail address for S.H. Goldberg: steven_h_goldberg{at}rush.edu
2 Orthosonics Ltd, Bremridge House, Ashburton, S. Devon TQ13 7JX, United Kingdom
3 St. Albans and Hemel Hempstead NHS Trust, Waverly Road, St. Albans, Herts, United Kingdom

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

One of the authors (M.Y.) is a full-time salaried employee of Orthosonics Ltd. One of the authors (B.B.) is a part-time paid consultant to Orthosonics Ltd. The other two authors (S.H.G. and M.S.C.) did not receive any payments or benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated. The equipment used in this study was provided by Orthosonics Ltd, Stryker Instruments, Howmedica, and Biomet. The cadavera were provided by Anatomical Service, Inc.

Background: Ultrasound devices can selectively remove cement during revision arthroplasty. These instruments initially were designed for the hip and knee but also have been applied to the upper extremity. We describe a patient in whom a radial nerve palsy and a pathologic humeral fracture developed after ultrasonic cement removal was performed because of an infection at the site of a total elbow arthroplasty. Biopsies of the humerus, the triceps muscle, and the radial nerve showed widespread necrosis consistent with thermal injury.

Methods: A study involving six human cadaveric specimens was conducted to measure temperature elevations in bone and adjacent soft tissue during cement removal with use of an ultrasound device with and without irrigation.

Results: While temperature increased only minimally during cement polymerization, ultrasonic melting and removal of cement with use of constant energy delivery led to markedly elevated temperatures in the humeral cortex, the triceps muscle, and the radial nerve. These temperatures were above the known thresholds for thermal injury and necrosis. Subsequently, strategies designed to allow for safe ultrasonic cement removal from the humerus were applied, including intermittent delivery of energy and the use of cold irrigation between probe passes. These strategies resulted in markedly lower maximum temperatures in all tissues tested.

Conclusions: Temperatures in the humerus, triceps, and, most importantly, the radial nerve can reach potentially dangerous levels when ultrasound technology is used to remove cement from the humerus. We suggest intermittent cold irrigation of the humeral canal, no tourniquet use, education of surgeons with regard to proper techniques designed to limit heat generation, and consideration of exposure and protection of the radial nerve when ultrasound devices are used.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?