The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:530-535.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.01753
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Alumina-on-Alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty
A Five-Year Minimum Follow-up Study
Jeong Joon Yoo, MD1,
Young-Min Kim, MD2,
Kang Sup Yoon, MD3,
Kyung-Hoi Koo, MD2,
Won Seok Song, MD1 and
Hee Joong Kim, MD1
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, 28
Yongondong, Chongnogu, 110-744, Seoul, Korea. E-mail address for H.J. Kim:
oskim{at}snu.ac.kr
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,
300 Gumidong, Bundanggu, 463-707, Seongnam, Korea
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul Municipal Boramae Hospital, 395
Shindaebangdong, Dongjackgu, 156-707, Seoul, Korea
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul
National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from the Seoul National
University Hospital Research Fund (grant number 06-03-063). None of the
authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to
provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or
directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund,
foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit
organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Ceramic-on-ceramic couplings are attractive alternative
bearing surfaces that have been reported to eliminate or reduce problems
related to polyethylene wear debris. Disappointing experiences with alumina
ceramic bearings in the past have led to many improvements in the manufacture
and design of ceramic implants. The purpose of the present study was to report
the results of contemporary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties with
regard to wear, osteolysis, and fracture of the ceramic after a minimum
duration of follow-up of five years.
Methods: We evaluated the results of a consecutive series of 100
primary alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasties that had been performed
with use of a metal-backed socket and a cementless stem in eighty-four
patients. All of the patients were sixty-five years of age or younger (mean
age, forty-one years), and a single surgeon performed all of the procedures.
After a minimum duration of follow-up of sixty months, one patient (one hip)
had died and four patients (six hips) had been lost to follow-up, leaving a
total of seventy-nine patients (ninety-three hips) available for study. All of
these patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically with special
attention to wear, periprosthetic osteolysis, and ceramic failure.
Results: The mean Harris hip score was 97 points at the time of the
latest follow-up evaluation. All prostheses demonstrated radiographic evidence
of bone ingrowth. No implant was loose radiographically, and no implant was
revised. Ceramic wear was not detectable in the thirty-seven hips in which the
femoral head could be differentiated from the cup on radiographs.
Periprosthetic osteolysis was not observed in any hip. A fracture of the
alumina femoral head and a peripheral chip fracture of the alumina insert
occurred in one hip following a motor-vehicle accident.
Conclusions: The results of contemporary alumina-on-alumina total
hip arthroplasty with a metal-backed socket and a cementless stem were
encouraging after a minimum duration of follow-up of five years. We believe
that these improved alumina-on-alumina bearing implants offer a promising
option for younger, active patients.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-H. Baek and S.-Y. Kim
Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty with Alumina Bearings in Patients Younger Than Fifty with Femoral Head Osteonecrosis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2008;
90(6):
1314 - 1320.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-H. Koo, Y.-C. Ha, W. H. Jung, S.-R. Kim, J. J. Yoo, and H. J. Kim
Isolated Fracture of the Ceramic Head After Third-Generation Alumina-on-Alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2008;
90(2):
329 - 336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.J. Lusty, C.C. Tai, R.P. Sew-Hoy, W.L. Walter, W.K. Walter, and B.A. Zicat
Third-Generation Alumina-on-Alumina Ceramic Bearings in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2007;
89(12):
2676 - 2683.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Nam, J. J. Yoo, Y. Lae Kim, Y.-M. Kim, M.-H. Lee, and H. J. Kim
Alumina-Debris-Induced Osteolysis in Contemporary Alumina-on-Alumina Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2007;
89(11):
2499 - 2503.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Poggie, T. R. Turgeon, and R. D. Coutts
Failure Analysis of a Ceramic Bearing Acetabular Component
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2007;
89(2):
367 - 375.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Seyler, P. M. Bonutti, J. Shen, M. Naughton, and M. Kester
Use of an Alumina-on-Alumina Bearing System in Total Hip Arthroplasty for Osteonecrosis of the Hip
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(suppl_3):
116 - 125.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-S. Park, S.-K. Hwang, W.-S. Choy, Y.-S. Kim, Y.-W. Moon, and S.-J. Lim
Ceramic Failure After Total Hip Arthroplasty with an Alumina-on-Alumina Bearing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2006;
88(4):
780 - 787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Savarino, M. Greco, E. Cenni, L. Cavasinni, R. Rotini, N. Baldini, and A. Giunti
Differences in ion release after ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-metal total hip replacement: MEDIUM-TERM FOLLOW-UP
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
April 1, 2006;
88-B(4):
472 - 476.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|