The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:483-489.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.01796
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
 Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 13: Spring 2005
Trauma Test 7: Spring 2005
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moran, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moran, C. G.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, A. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Hip
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Early Mortality After Hip Fracture: Is Delay Before Surgery Important?

Christopher G. Moran, MD, FRCS(Ed)1, Russell T. Wenn, BA1, Manoj Sikand, MS, FRCS1 and Andrew M. Taylor, DM, FRCS1

1 Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Nottingham, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom. E-mail address for M. Sikand: sikand100{at}yahoo.com

Investigation performed at the Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

Background: Hip fracture is associated with high mortality among the elderly. Most patients require surgery, but the timing of the operation remains controversial. Surgery within twenty-four hours after admission has been recommended, but evidence supporting this approach is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine whether a delay in surgery for hip fractures affects postoperative mortality among elderly patients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study of 2660 patients who underwent surgical treatment of a hip fracture at one university hospital. We measured mortality rates following the surgery in relation to the delay in the surgery and the acute medical comorbidities on admission.

Results: The mortality following the hip fracture surgery was 9% (246 of 2660) at thirty days, 19% at ninety days, and 30% at twelve months. Of the patients who had been declared fit for surgery, those operated on without delay had a thirty-day mortality of 8.7% and those for whom the surgery had been delayed between one and four days had a thirty-day mortality of 7.3%. This difference was not significant (p = 0.51). The thirty-day mortality for patients for whom the surgery had been delayed for more than four days was 10.7%, and this small group had significantly increased mortality at ninety days (hazard ratio = 2.25; p = 0.001) and one year (hazard ratio = 2.4; p = 0.001). Patients who had been admitted with an acute medical comorbidity that required treatment prior to the surgery had a thirty-day mortality of 17%, which was nearly 2.5 times greater than that for patients who had been initially considered fit for surgery (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval = 1.6 to 3.3; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The thirty-day mortality following surgery for a hip fracture was 9%. Patients with medical comorbidities that delayed surgery had 2.5 times the risk of death within thirty days after the surgery compared with patients without comorbidities that delayed surgery. Mortality was not increased when the surgery was delayed up to four days for patients who were otherwise fit for hip fracture surgery. However, a delay of more than four days significantly increased mortality.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. J. Hoppe, E. H. Schemitsch, S. Morshed, P. Tornetta III, and M. Bhandari
Hierarchy of Evidence: Where Observational Studies Fit in and Why We Need Them
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_3): 2 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
A. Bottle and P. Aylin
Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study
BMJ, April 22, 2006; 332(7547): 947 - 951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page
J J W Roche, R T Wenn, O Sahota, and C G Moran
Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study
BMJ, December 10, 2005; 331(7529): 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
P. A. Cole and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2005; 87(12): 2823 - 2838.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qual Saf Health CareHome page
R Sund and A Liski
Quality effects of operative delay on mortality in hip fracture treatment
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2005; 14(5): 371 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]