The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:213-225.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00204
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Chiari Pelvic Osteotomy for Advanced Osteoarthritis in Patients with Hip Dysplasia
Hiroshi Ito, MD1,
Takeo Matsuno, MD1 and
Akio Minami, MD2
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Asahikawa Medical College, Midorigaoka
Higashi 2-1-1-1, Asahikawa 078-8510, Japan. E-mail address for H. Ito:
itobiro{at}asahikawa-med.ac.jp
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hokkaido University School of Medicine,
Kita-ku Kita-15 Nishi-7, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan
Investigation performed at Asahikawa Medical College, Asahikawa,
Japan
The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was
presented was published in JBJS Vol. 86-A, pp. 1439-1445, July 2004
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or
other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
The line drawings in this article are the work of Jennifer Fairman
(jfairman{at}fairmanstudios.com).
BACKGROUND:
It is not clear whether a Chiari pelvic osteotomy performed for the
treatment of advanced osteoarthritis can delay the need for total hip
arthroplasty. We present the mid-term results of the Chiari pelvic osteotomy
performed for the treatment of Tönnis grade-3 osteoarthritis (large
cysts, severe narrowing of the joint space, or severe deformity or necrosis of
the head with extensive osteophyte formation), with a particular focus on
whether this procedure can delay the need for total hip arthroplasty.
METHODS:
We followed thirty-two hips in thirty-one patients with Tönnis grade-3
osteoarthritis who had refused total hip arthroplasty and had been treated
with a Chiari pelvic osteotomy. The mean age at the time of surgery was 35.2
years. The mean duration of follow-up was 11.2 years, at which time clinical
evaluation with the Harris hip score and radiographic evaluation were
performed.
RESULTS:
The average Harris hip score improved from 52 points preoperatively to 77
points at the time of follow-up; the average pain score improved from 20 to 31
points. Three hips with a hip score of <70 points required totalhip
arthroplasty. With a hip score of <70 points as the end point, the
cumulative rate of survival at ten years was 72%. The clinical outcome was
significantly influenced by the preoperative center-edge angle (p = 0.004),
the preoperative acetabular head index (p = 0.039), achievement of the
appropriate osteotomy level (p = 0.011), and superior migration (p = 0.009)
and lateral migration (p = 0.026) of the femoral head.
CONCLUSIONS:
Although the clinical results were inferior to those of total hip
arthroplasty, Chiari pelvic osteotomy may be an option for young patients with
advanced osteoarthritis who prefer a joint-conserving procedure to total hip
arthroplasty and accept a clinical outcome that is predicted to be less
optimal than that of total hip arthroplasty. Moderate dysplasia and moderate
subluxation without complete obliteration of the joint space and a
preoperative centeredge angle of at least 10° are desirable selection
criteria.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|