The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:166-174.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00261
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Proximal Row Carpectomy
Peter J. Stern, MD1,
Steven S. Agabegi, MD1,
Thomas R. Kiefhaber, MD2 and
Michael L. DiDonna, MD3
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of
Medicine, P.O. Box 670212, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0212. E-mail address for P.J.
Stern:
sternpj{at}ucmail.uc.edu
2 Hand Surgery Specialists, 538 Oak Street, Suite 200, Cincinnati, OH
45219
3 El Paso Orthopaedic Surgery Group, 1720 Murchison, El Paso TX 79902
Investigation performed at the University of Cincinnati College of
Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
The original scientific article in which the surgical technique was
presented was published in JBJS Vol. 86-A, pp. 2359-2365, November
2004
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or
other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
The line drawings in this article are the work of Joanne Haderer
Müller of Haderer & Müller
(biomedart{at}haderermuller.com).
BACKGROUND:
Proximal row carpectomy is an accepted motion-sparing surgical procedure
for the treatment of degenerative conditions of the wrist. However, there is
little information regarding the long-term clinical and radiographic results
following this procedure.
METHODS:
Twenty-two wrists in twenty-one patients underwent proximal row carpectomy
for the treatment of degenerative arthritis between 1980 and 1992. Objective
and subjective function was assessed after a minimum duration of follow-up of
ten years (average, fourteen years).
RESULTS:
There were four failures (18%) requiring fusion at an average of seven
years. All four failures occurred in patients who were thirty-five years of
age or less at the time of the proximal row carpectomy (p = 0.03). The wrists
that did not fail had an average flexion-extension arc of 72°, associated
with an average grip strength of 91% of that on the contralateral side. The
patients were very satisfied with fourteen of the eighteen wrists that did not
fail and were satisfied with the remaining four. The patients rated nine
wrists as not painful, four as mildly painful, five as moderately painful, and
none as severely painful. The average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and
Hand score was 9 points. Radiographs revealed no loss of the radiocapitate
space in three of the seventeen wrists for which radiographs were made,
reduced space in seven, and complete loss of the space in seven. With the
numbers available, there was no significant association between loss of joint
space seen on radiographs and subjective and objective function.
CONCLUSIONS:
At the time of long-term followup, all patients older than thirtyfive years
of age at the time of a proximal row carpectomy had maintained a satisfactory
range of motion, grip strength, and pain relief and were satisfied with the
result. Caution should be exercised in performing the procedure in patients
younger than thirty-five years of age. Although degeneration of the
radiocapitate joint was seen radiographically in fourteen of the seventeen
wrists, it did not preclude a successful clinical result.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
|