The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:2741-2749.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00166
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
An Economic Evaluation of Operative Compared with Nonoperative Management of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures
Carmen A. Brauer, MD, MSc, FRCSC1,
Braden J. Manns, MD, MSc, FRCPC2,
Michael Ko, MD3,
Cam Donaldson, PhD4 and
Richard Buckley, MD, FRCSC5
1 Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, 718
Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address:
cbrauer{at}hsph.harvard.edu
2 Departments of Community Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Calgary,
1403 29th Street N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 2T9, Canada
3 Queen's University School of Medicine, 68 Barrie Street, Queen's University,
Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
4 Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 21
Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AA, United Kingdom
5 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Drive
N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
Investigation performed at Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard
School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from Al-berta Heritage
Foundation for Medical Research. None of the authors received payments or
other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: The choice of therapy for a displaced intra-articular
calcaneal fracture has long been a source of uncertainty in orthopaedic
surgery, both in terms of the impact of the therapy on clinical outcomes and
on health-care and non-health-care costs. We performed an economic evaluation,
based on the results of a randomized clinical trial, to evaluate the economic
implications of operative compared with nonoperative management of this
fracture.
Methods: An economic evaluation was performed, with use of a
four-year time horizon, to determine the effect on costs and health benefits
of operative compared with nonoperative management for a group of patients
with displaced intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus. The complication
rate, arthrodesis rate, survival data, and health-outcome data were estimated
prospectively from a recent randomized clinical trial. Direct health-care
costs and indirect costs (the cost of time lost from work) were estimated
retrospectively from the center treating the majority of the patients.
Results: Operative management resulted in a lower rate of subtalar
arthrodesis and a shorter time off from work compared with nonoperative
treatment. When indirect costs, such as the time lost from work, were included
in the analysis, operative management was less costly (an average savings of
Can$19,000 per patient) and more effective, thus making it the preferred
strategy. The result was most sensitive to the estimates of the costs of time
lost from work. When these costs were excluded, operative treatment remained
more effective, but with an increased average cost of Can$2800 per
patient.
Conclusions: Calcaneal fractures have been recognized as having
relatively poor clinical outcomes and a major socioeconomic impact with regard
to time lost from work and recreation. Our analysis suggests that operative
management of displaced intra-articular fractures is economically attractive.
However, further exploration of the impact and valuation of time lost from
work and patient outcomes is required.
Level of Evidence: Economic and decision analysis, Level
II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of
evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Gougoulias, A. Khanna, D. J. McBride, and N. Maffulli
Management of calcaneal fractures: systematic review of randomized trials
Br. Med. Bull.,
December 1, 2009;
92(1):
153 - 167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Brauer and K. J. Bozic
Using Observational Data for Decision Analysis and Economic Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2009;
91(Supplement_3):
73 - 79.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. S. Radnay, M. P. Clare, and R. W. Sanders
Subtalar Fusion After Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: Does Initial Operative Treatment Matter?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2009;
91(3):
541 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Poeze, J. P.A.M. Verbruggen, and P. R.G. Brink
The Relationship Between the Outcome of Operatively Treated Calcaneal Fractures and Institutional Fracture Load. A Systematic Review of the Literature
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2008;
90(5):
1013 - 1021.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. G. Wright
A Practical Guide to Assigning Levels of Evidence
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2007;
89(5):
1128 - 1130.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. A. Cole and M. Bhandari
What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(11):
2545 - 2561.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|