The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:2626-2631.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00088
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Early Postoperative Transverse Pelvic Fracture: A New Complication Related to Revision Arthroplasty with an Uncemented Cup
Bryan D. Springer, MD1,
Daniel J. Berry, MD2,
Miguel E. Cabanela, MD2,
Arlen D. Hanssen, MD2 and
David G. Lewallen, MD2
1 OrthoCarolina Hip and Knee Center, 1915 Randolph Road, Charlotte, NC 28209.
E-mail address:
bryan.springer{at}orthocarolina.com
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W.,
Rochester, MN 55905
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo
Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article,
on our web site
(www.jbjs.org)
and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at
781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from Zimmer, Implex (A.D.H.,
D.G.L.), Stryker (M.E.C.), and DePuy (D.J.B.). In addition, one or more of the
authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to
provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Zimmer; Implex [A.D.H.,
D.G.L.]; Stryker [M.E.C.]; and DePuy [D.J.B.]). No commercial entity paid or
directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund,
foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit
organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Uncemented hemispherical cups are commonly used to
revise failed acetabular total hip components, even in the presence of marked
acetabular bone loss. The purpose of the present study was to report a new
complication of acetabular component revision with an uncemented hemispherical
cup.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of seven patients
(seven hips) in whom an early postoperative transverse acetabular fracture had
developed following the implantation of an uncemented trabecular metal cup for
the revision of a failed acetabular component. All patients were female. The
average age was 63.6 years. The reason for acetabular revision was aseptic
loosening of the original cup in five patients and reimplantation after a
previous resection arthroplasty in the remaining two. The average cup size
used for revision was 58 mm. In two hips, additional modular acetabular metal
augments were used to restore the acetabular rim.
Results: The average postoperative time to diagnosis of a transverse
acetabular fracture was eight months. Five of the seven patients presented
with a marked acute increase in pain and a new displaced transverse acetabular
fracture (pelvic discontinuity) that was visible on plain radiographs. Two
patients were asymptomatic but had a nondisplaced transverse acetabular
fracture. In all seven patients, the trabecular metal socket appeared
radiographically to be well fixed to part of the pelvis. The five patients
with a displaced fracture were managed with additional surgery to stabilize
the fracture.
Conclusions: To our knowledge, early postoperative transverse pelvic
fractures following revision of the acetabular component have not been
reported previously. The most likely causes of this complication are further
weakening of the remaining pelvic bone stock as a result of the reaming
required to obtain a secure fit of a large-diameter hemispherical socket and
the cyclic stresses on the weakened bone with resumption of walking. It is
unlikely that the fractures occurred intraoperatively because in each case the
socket remained well fixed to one of the pelvic fragments.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Levine, C. J. Della Valle, and J. J. Jacobs
Applications of Porous Tantalum in Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
November 1, 2006;
14(12):
646 - 655.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|