The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:2380-2387.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00174
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Treatment for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Waves with Core Decompression and Bone-Grafting
Ching-Jen Wang, MD1,
Feng-Sheng Wang, PhD1,
Chung-Cheng Huang, MD1,
Kuender D. Yang, MD, PhD1,
Lin-Hsiu Weng, MD1 and
Hsuan-Ying Huang, MD1
1 Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (C.-J.W. and L.-H.W.), Medical Research
(F.-S.W. and K.D.Y.), Diagnostic Radiology (C.-C.H.), and Pathology (H.-Y.H.),
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Medical Center, 123 Ta-Pei Road, Niao-Sung
Hsiang, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan. E-mail address for C.-J. Wang:
w281211{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw
Investigation performed at the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Medical Research, Diagnostic Radiology, and Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial
Hospital Medical Center, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from the Chang Gung Research
Fund (CMRP 8010), National Science Council (NSC 92-2314-B-182A-100), and
National Health Research Institute (NHRI-EX94-9423EP). None of the authors
received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide
such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed,
or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with
which the authors are affiliated or associated.
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article,
on our web site
(www.jbjs.org)
and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at
781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
Background: There is continuing controversy regarding the optimal
treatment for patients with symptomatic early-stage osteonecrosis of the
femoral head. We compared the results of noninvasive treatment with
extracorporeal shock waves with those of core decompression and bone-grafting
in similar groups of patients.
Methods: Patients with stage-I, II, or III osteonecrosis were
randomly assigned to be treated either with shock waves or with core
decompression and nonvascularized fibular grafting. The shock-wave group
consisted of twenty-three patients (twenty-nine hips), and the surgical group
consisted of twenty-five patients (twenty-eight hips). The patients in the two
groups had similar demographic characteristics, duration and stage of disease,
and duration of follow-up. The patients in the shock-wave group received a
single treatment with 6000 impulses of shock waves at 28 kV to the affected
hip. The evaluation parameters included clinical assessment of pain with a
visual analog pain scale, Harris hip scores, and an assessment of activities
of daily living and work capacity. Radiographic assessment was performed with
serial plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging.
Results: Before treatment, the two groups had similar pain and
Harris hip scores. At an average of twenty-five months after treatment, the
pain and Harris hip scores in the shock-wave group were significantly improved
compared with the pretreatment scores (p < 0.001). In this group, 79% of
the hips were improved, 10% were unchanged, and 10% were worse. Of the hips
treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft, 29% were improved, 36% were
unchanged, and 36% were worse. In the shock-wave group, imaging studies showed
regression of five of the thirteen lesions that had been designated as stage I
or II before treatment and no regression of a stage-III lesion. Two stage-II
and two stage-III lesions progressed. In the surgical group, four lesions
regressed and fifteen (of the nineteen graded as stage I or II) progressed.
The remaining nine lesions were unchanged.
Conclusions: Extracorporeal shock-wave treatment appeared to be more
effective than core decompression and nonvascularized fibular grafting in
patients with early-stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Long-term results
are needed to determine whether the effect of this novel method of treatment
for osteonecrosis of the femoral head endures.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-J. Wang, F.-S. Wang, J.-Y. Ko, H.-Y. Huang, C.-J. Chen, Y.-C. Sun, and Y.-J. Yang
Extracorporeal shockwave therapy shows regeneration in hip necrosis
Rheumatology,
April 1, 2008;
47(4):
542 - 546.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont, G. A. Marulanda, L. C. Jones, K. J. Saleh, N. Gordon, D. S. Hungerford, and M. E. Steinberg
Systematic Analysis of Classification Systems for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(suppl_3):
16 - 26.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Cui, Z. Xiao, X. Li, K. J. Saleh, and G. Balian
Use of Genetically Engineered Bone-Marrow Stem Cells to Treat Femoral Defects: An Experimental Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(suppl_3):
167 - 172.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont, L. C. Jones, and D. S. Hungerford
Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Ten Years Later
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2006;
88(5):
1117 - 1132.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|