The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:2217-2226.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02898
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Trochanteric-Entry Long Cephalomedullary Nailing of Subtrochanteric Fractures Caused by Low-Energy Trauma
C. Michael Robinson, BMedSci, FRCS Ed(Orth)1,
S. Houshian, MD1 and
L.A.K. Khan, BSc, MRCSEd1
1 Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh at Little
France, Old Dalkeith Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SU, United Kingdom. E-mail address
for C.M. Robinson:
c.mike.robinson{at}ed.ac.uk
Investigation performed at the Edinburgh Orthopaedic Trauma Unit, The
Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or
other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur that are caused
by low-energy trauma are less common than other proximal femoral fractures,
but they occur in a similar population of elderly individuals, who are often
socially dependent and medically frail. Although a wide range of operative
techniques have been used, cephalomedullary nailing theoretically provides the
most minimally invasive and biomechanically stable means of treating these
complex fractures. The purpose of the present review was to evaluate the
functional outcome and perioperative complications associated with the use of
a trochanteric-entry cephalomedullary nail to treat all low-energy
subtrochanteric fractures that were seen at a single institution.
Methods: Over an eight-year period, we used the long Gamma nail to
treat a consecutive series of 302 local patients who had sustained a
subtrochanteric fracture during low-energy trauma. The mortality, prevalence
of complications, and functional outcome were prospectively assessed during
the first year after the injury. Survival analysis was used to assess the
rates of reoperation and implant revision during the first year after
surgery.
Results: At one year, seventy-four (24.5%) of the original 302
patients had died and seventeen (5.6%) had been lost to follow-up. The
remaining 211 patients (69.9%) were evaluated with regard to the functional
outcome and postoperative complications during the first year after the
injury. As with other proximal femoral fractures in the elderly, there was an
increased level of social dependence, an increase in the use of walking aids,
and a reduction in mobility among survivors. Although eighty-eight (41.7%) of
the 211 patients who were evaluated at one year after the injury had some
degree of hip discomfort, only two described the pain as severe and disabling.
Reoperation for the treatment of implant or fracture-related complications was
required in twenty-seven (8.9%) of the 302 patients; however, only eighteen of
these patients required nail revision, corresponding with a one-year
nail-revision rate of 7.1% (95% confidence interval, 4.0% to 10.2%) on
survival analysis. Of the 250 patients who survived for six months after the
injury, five (2%) had a nonunion that was confirmed at the time of surgical
exploration. Complications related to the proximal lag screw were seen in
twelve of the original 302 patients, and a fracture distal to the tip of the
nail occurred in five. Although superficial wound infection was relatively
common, deep infection occurred in only five of the 302 patients.
Conclusions: Subtrochanteric fractures caused by low-energy trauma
are similar to other proximal femoral fractures, with a high mortality rate
during the first year after the injury. Trochanteric-entry cephalomedullary
nails are associated with an acceptable rate of perioperative complications
and favorable functional outcomes.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions
to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Forte, B. A. Virnig, R. L. Kane, S. Durham, M. Bhandari, R. Feldman, and M. F. Swiontkowski
Geographic Variation in Device Use for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2008;
90(4):
691 - 699.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. W. Lundy
Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
November 1, 2007;
15(11):
663 - 671.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|