The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:2160-2168.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.02305
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
CME 4: October, November, December 2005
Hand Test 5: Winter 2006
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dias, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, J.R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dias, J.J.
Right arrow Articles by Thompson, J.R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hand/Wrist
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Should Acute Scaphoid Fractures Be Fixed?

A Randomized Controlled Trial

J.J. Dias, MD, FRCS1, C.J. Wildin, FRCS(Orth)1, B. Bhowal, FRCS(Orth)1 and J.R. Thompson, PhD2

1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Glenfield Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester, Groby Road, Leicester LE3 9QP, United Kingdom. E-mail address for J.J. Dias: joseph.dias{at}uhl-tr.nhs.uk
2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Leicester, 22-28 Princess Road West, Leicester LE1 6TP, United Kingdom

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity, although Herbert screws were provided by Zimmer for this study. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: With the proliferation of different fixation screws, there is an increasing trend to recommend early internal fixation of the broken scaphoid even if the fracture is not displaced. The benefits and risks of early fixation of scaphoid fractures have not been established. These were investigated in eighty-eight patients who were of working age with clearly defined minimally displaced or undisplaced bicortical fractures of the waist of the scaphoid.

Methods: Patients who provided informed consent were randomized to treatment with early internal fixation with use of a Herbert screw without a cast (forty-four patients) or to nonoperative treatment for eight weeks with immobilization in a below-the-elbow plaster cast with the thumb left free (forty-four patients). The patients were evaluated at two, eight, twelve, twenty-six, and fifty-two weeks with respect to the severity of pain; tenderness; swelling; wrist movement; grip strength; and symptoms and disability, which were assessed with the Patient Evaluation Measure. In addition, radiographs were made and assessed at each visit.

Results: No difference was detected between the groups with respect to age, sex, hand dominance, side of injury, mechanism of injury, or the occupation of the patients. The range of motion, score on the Patient Evaluation Measure, and grip strength were significantly better in the group managed operatively than in the group managed nonoperatively at the eight-week follow-up evaluation, which corresponded with the visit when the cast was removed in that group. Patients returned to work at five to six weeks after the injury in both groups. At twelve weeks, grip strength was better in patients who had had surgery. No significant difference was detected between the two groups with respect to any other outcome measure at any other time. Ten of the forty-four fractures treated nonoperatively had not healed radiographically at twelve weeks, and, as a consequence, the treatment was altered. Complications occurred in thirteen patients who had been managed operatively. All complications were minor, and ten were related to the scar.

Conclusions: This study did not demonstrate a clear overall benefit of early fixation of acute scaphoid fractures beyond the decrease in the rate of a change in treatment because of a delayed union at twelve weeks. Early internal fixation of minimally displaced or nondisplaced fractures of the scaphoid waist, which would heal in a cast, could lead to overtreatment of a large proportion of such fractures, exposing such patients to avoidable surgical risk. Thus, we have adopted a program of so-called aggressive conservative treatment, whereby we carefully assess fracture-healing with plain radiographs, and computed tomography scans if necessary, after six to eight weeks of cast immobilization and recommend surgical fixation with or without bone-grafting at that time if a gap is identified at the fracture site. Such an approach should result in fracture union in over 95% of such patients.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. Grewal and G. King
Percutaneous Screw Fixation Led to Faster Recovery and Return to Work Than Immobilization for Fractures of the Waist of the Scaphoid
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(8): 1793 - 1793.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. Vinnars, M. Pietreanu, A. Bodestedt, F. a. Ekenstam, and B. Gerdin
Nonoperative Compared with Operative Treatment of Acute Scaphoid Fractures. A Randomized Clinical Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2008; 90(6): 1176 - 1185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. P. Gutow
Percutaneous Fixation of Scaphoid Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2007; 15(8): 474 - 485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
Evidence based journal watch
Br. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2006; 40(8): 735 - 736.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Should Acute Scaphoid Fractures Be Fixed?
Sameer Batra
JBJS Online, 15 Nov 2005 [Full text]
Treatment of Acute Scaphoid Fractures
Eric P. Hofmeister
JBJS Online, 8 Nov 2005 [Full text]