The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2005;87:145-152.
doi:10.2106/JBJS.C.01550
© 2005 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exam for this article:
Foot/Ankle Test 6: Spring 2005
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannikas, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannikas, K. A.
Right arrow Articles by Buckley, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Foot/Ankle
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Functional Outcome Following Bone Transport Reconstruction of Distal Tibial Defects

Konstantinos A. Giannikas, FRCS, DSM1, Constantinos N. Maganaris, PhD2, Michael T. Karski, MRCS3, Peter Twigg, PhD4, Richard A. Wilkes, FRCS3 and John G. Buckley, PhD4

1 15, Makedonias Street, Ag Paraskevi, 15341, Athens, Greece. E-mail address: kostas.giannikas{at}lineone.net
2 Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Hassall Road, Alsager, Stoke-on-Trent ST7 2HL, United Kingdom
3 Hope Hospital, Stott Lane, Salford M6 8HD United Kingdom
4 Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP United Kingdom

Investigation performed at the Department of Optometry, University of Bradford, Bradford, and the Institute for Biophysical and Clinical Research into Human Movement, Manchester Metropolitan University, Alsager, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Smith and Nephew Healthcare. (Smith and Nephew Healthcare paid the traveling expenses of the volunteers who participated in this study.) None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: Little has been written about the functional outcome of patients treated with bone transport to reconstruct a distal tibial defect. The aim of this study was to investigate the functional capabilities of patients who had undergone reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of a distal tibial defect in one lower limb.

Methods: At least eighteen months after completion of treatment, eight patients who had no pain and were able to walk and climb stairs without difficulty performed isometric ankle plantar flexion maximum voluntary contractions while the electromyographic activity of the tibialis anterior and triceps surae muscles was simultaneously recorded. Seven of the patients also underwent gait analysis. Data for the involved limb were compared with those collected for the contralateral limb.

Results: During gait, stance time (p = 0.01), the plantar flexion angular displacement and peak moment developed during the second half of stance (p < 0.046), and the amount of ankle power generated (p = 0.02) were significantly decreased in the involved limb compared with the contralateral limb. Similar decreases were observed in the plantar flexion (p = 0.01) and dorsiflexion (p = 0.01) maximum voluntary contractions and the corresponding electromyographic activity (p = 0.01).

Conclusions: These results suggest that adaptive changes had occurred at the level of the transported muscles, which affected both routine and maximal effort capabilities. These findings contribute to our understanding of the functional limitations of patients who have undergone bone transport with its obligatory shortening of muscle length.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?