The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:2050-2060 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Impaction Bone-Grafting in Revision Joint Replacement Surgery
Andrew D. Toms, MBChB, FRCS(Ed), MSc, FRCS(Tr+Orth)1,
Ross L. Barker, FRCS2,
Richard Spencer Jones, MB, BS, FRCS, FRCS(Tr+Orth)2 and
Jan Herman Kuiper, PhD2
1 35 Simpsons Walk, Horsehay, Telford, Shropshire TF4 2PA, England. E-mail
address:
toms{at}at-rj.freeserve.co.uk
2 Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire SY10
7AG, England
Investigation performed at the Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic
Hospital, Oswestry, Shropshire, England
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or
other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
The standard graft material for impaction bone-grafting is fresh-frozen
femoral head allograft morselized to a particle size as large as is practical
to ensure stability and allow new bone formation.
The graft must be sufficiently compacted to provide immediate mechanical
stability; this requires containment of the graft and substantial impaction
energy.
Diaphyseal bone fracture and excessive implant migration are the most
common complications of the operation.
Impaction bone-grafting in revision total hip replacement has produced good
medium-term results on both the acetabular and the femoral side.
The use of compacted morselized bone graft is a relatively new technique in
revision knee surgery and requires longer-term follow-up with larger numbers
of patients to assess its value.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Meneghini, D. G. Lewallen, and A. D. Hanssen
Use of Porous Tantalum Metaphyseal Cones for Severe Tibial Bone Loss During Revision Total Knee Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2008;
90(1):
78 - 84.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R Dattani
Femoral osteolysis following total hip replacement
Postgrad. Med. J.,
May 1, 2007;
83(979):
312 - 316.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-W. Wang, C.-Y. Fong, Y.-S. Su, and H.-N. Yu
Acetabular revision with morsellised allogenic bone graft and a cemented metal-backed component
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
May 1, 2006;
88-B(5):
586 - 591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. A. Sexton, C. A. Stossel, and F. S. Haddad
The Kent hip prosthesis: AN EVALUATION OF 145 PROSTHESES AFTER A MEAN OF 5.1 YEARS
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
March 1, 2006;
88-B(3):
310 - 314.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Day, S. Megson, and D. Wood
Iontophoresis as a means of delivering antibiotics into allograft bone
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
November 1, 2005;
87-B(11):
1568 - 1574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|