The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:2015-2021 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Orientation of the Femoral Component in Surface Arthroplasty of the Hip
A Biomechanical and Clinical Analysis
Paul E. Beaulé, MD, FRCSC1,
Jessica L. Lee, MS2,
Michel J. Le Duff, MA1,
Harlan C. Amstutz, MD1 and
Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD3
1 Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street,
Los Angeles, CA 90007. E-mail address for P.E. Beaulé:
pbeaule{at}laoh.ucla.edu
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, OHE
500, MC1451, University Park, Los Angeles, CA 90007. E-mail address:
jessicll{at}usc.edu
3 Biomechanics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street, Los
Angeles, CA 90007-2697
Investigation performed at the Joint Replacement Institute and the J.
Vernon Luck Sr., MD, Orthopaedic Research Center, Orthopaedic Hospital/UCLA,
Los Angeles, California
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from Los Angeles Orthopaedic
Hospital Foundation and William G. McGowan Charitable Fund. In addition, one
or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or
agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Wright Medical
Technology). Also, a commercial entity (Wright Medical Technology) paid or
directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with
which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Although the orientation of the femoral component has
been shown to influence the outcome of total hip replacement, its effect on
the clinical outcome of surface arthroplasty has not been studied, to our
knowledge. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between
femoral component positioning and the outcome of a surface arthroplasty of the
hip.
Methods: We reviewed the results of ninety-four hybrid
metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties in patients who were forty years old or
younger at the time of the operation and were followed for a minimum of two
years or until the prosthesis failed. Measurements of the hip reconstruction
were made on the anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. The correlation between
the orientation of the femoral component and the outcome of the arthroplasty
was evaluated, as were stresses within the resurfaced femoral head as a
function of the orientation of the femoral component.
Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 4.2 years. Thirteen hips
had an adverse outcome, defined as conversion to a total hip replacement,
radiolucency of >1 mm in thickness adjacent to the femoral stem, or
narrowing of the femoral neck of >10%. The mean femoral stem-shaft angle in
the coronal plane was 138°, with the hips that had an adverse outcome
having a significantly lower mean angle than the rest of the cohort (133°
compared with 139°, p = 0.03). Hips with an angle of 130° had an
increase in the relative risk of an adverse outcome by a factor of 6.1 (p <
0.004). In the entire cohort, stresses in the superior aspect of the
resurfaced femoral head were substantially lower during slow walking than they
were during fast walking (7.1 N/mm2 compared with 14.2
N/mm2).
Conclusions: Optimizing the femoral stem-shaft angle toward a valgus
orientation during the preparation of the femoral head is important when a hip
is being reconstructed with a surface arthroplasty because the resurfaced hip
transmits the load through a narrow critical zone in the femoral head-neck
region and the valgus angulation may reduce these stresses.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2
(retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete
description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Clohisy, P. E. Beaule, A. O'Malley, M. R. Safran, and P. Schoenecker
AOA Symposium. Hip Disease in the Young Adult: Current Concepts of Etiology and Surgical Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2008;
90(10):
2267 - 2281.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. P. Vail, R. R. Glisson, D. E. Dominguez, K. Kitaoka, and D. Ottaviano
Position of Hip Resurfacing Component Affects Strain and Resistance to Fracture in the Femoral Neck
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2008;
90(9):
1951 - 1960.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. P. Cobb, V. Kannan, W. Dandachli, F. Iranpour, K. U. Brust, and A. J. Hart
Learning How to Resurface Cam-Type Femoral Heads with Acceptable Accuracy and Precision: The Role of Computed Tomography-Based Navigation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
57 - 64.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Romanowski and M. L. Swank
Imageless Navigation in Hip Resurfacing: Avoiding Component Malposition During the Surgeon Learning Curve
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
65 - 70.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Seyler, L. P. Lai, D. I. Sprinkle, W. G. Ward, and R. H. Jinnah
Does Computer-Assisted Surgery Improve Accuracy and Decrease the Learning Curve in Hip Resurfacing? A Radiographic Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
71 - 80.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Ong, M. T. Manley, and S. M. Kurtz
Have Contemporary Hip Resurfacing Designs Reached Maturity? A Review
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
81 - 88.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. J. Richards, D. Giannitsios, O. L. Huk, D. J. Zukor, T. Steffen, and J. Antoniou
Risk of Periprosthetic Femoral Neck Fracture After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Valgus Compared with Anatomic Alignment. A Biomechanical and Clinical Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
96 - 101.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Williams, I. Leslie, G. Isaac, Z. Jin, E. Ingham, and J. Fisher
Tribology and Wear of Metal-on-Metal Hip Prostheses: Influence of Cup Angle and Head Position
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2008;
90(Supplement_3):
111 - 117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Shimmin, P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(3):
637 - 654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Amstutz, J. T. Antoniades, and M. J. Le Duff
Results of Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Hip Resurfacing for Crowe Type-I and II Developmental Dysplasia
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2007;
89(2):
339 - 346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Beaule, P. Campbell, Z. Lu, K. Leunig-Ganz, M. Beck, M. Leunig, and R. Ganz
Vascularity of the Arthritic Femoral Head and Hip Resurfacing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2006;
88(suppl_4):
85 - 96.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Huo and N. F. Gilbert
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2005;
87(9):
2133 - 2146.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Sayana, R. A. Brand, J. D. Heckman, and J. Scott
The Least Publishable Unit * R.A. Brand, J.D. Heckman, and J. Scott reply:
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2005;
87(3):
679 - 680.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Untitled
- Paul E. Beaule, M.D., FRCSC, et al.
- JBJS Online, 21 Mar 2005
[Full text]
|