This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 9: Topics of Interest in Hip Arthroplasty
CME 3: July, August, September 2004
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaulé, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ebramzadeh, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beaulé, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Ebramzadeh, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Hip
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:2015-2021 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Orientation of the Femoral Component in Surface Arthroplasty of the Hip

A Biomechanical and Clinical Analysis

Paul E. Beaulé, MD, FRCSC1, Jessica L. Lee, MS2, Michel J. Le Duff, MA1, Harlan C. Amstutz, MD1 and Edward Ebramzadeh, PhD3

1 Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90007. E-mail address for P.E. Beaulé: pbeaule{at}laoh.ucla.edu
2 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, OHE 500, MC1451, University Park, Los Angeles, CA 90007. E-mail address: jessicll{at}usc.edu
3 Biomechanics Laboratory, Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90007-2697

Investigation performed at the Joint Replacement Institute and the J. Vernon Luck Sr., MD, Orthopaedic Research Center, Orthopaedic Hospital/UCLA, Los Angeles, California

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital Foundation and William G. McGowan Charitable Fund. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Wright Medical Technology). Also, a commercial entity (Wright Medical Technology) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: Although the orientation of the femoral component has been shown to influence the outcome of total hip replacement, its effect on the clinical outcome of surface arthroplasty has not been studied, to our knowledge. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between femoral component positioning and the outcome of a surface arthroplasty of the hip.

Methods: We reviewed the results of ninety-four hybrid metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties in patients who were forty years old or younger at the time of the operation and were followed for a minimum of two years or until the prosthesis failed. Measurements of the hip reconstruction were made on the anteroposterior pelvic radiograph. The correlation between the orientation of the femoral component and the outcome of the arthroplasty was evaluated, as were stresses within the resurfaced femoral head as a function of the orientation of the femoral component.

Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 4.2 years. Thirteen hips had an adverse outcome, defined as conversion to a total hip replacement, radiolucency of >1 mm in thickness adjacent to the femoral stem, or narrowing of the femoral neck of >10%. The mean femoral stem-shaft angle in the coronal plane was 138°, with the hips that had an adverse outcome having a significantly lower mean angle than the rest of the cohort (133° compared with 139°, p = 0.03). Hips with an angle of ≤130° had an increase in the relative risk of an adverse outcome by a factor of 6.1 (p < 0.004). In the entire cohort, stresses in the superior aspect of the resurfaced femoral head were substantially lower during slow walking than they were during fast walking (7.1 N/mm2 compared with 14.2 N/mm2).

Conclusions: Optimizing the femoral stem-shaft angle toward a valgus orientation during the preparation of the femoral head is important when a hip is being reconstructed with a surface arthroplasty because the resurfaced hip transmits the load through a narrow critical zone in the femoral head-neck region and the valgus angulation may reduce these stresses.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. C. Clohisy, P. E. Beaule, A. O'Malley, M. R. Safran, and P. Schoenecker
AOA Symposium. Hip Disease in the Young Adult: Current Concepts of Etiology and Surgical Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2008; 90(10): 2267 - 2281.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. P. Vail, R. R. Glisson, D. E. Dominguez, K. Kitaoka, and D. Ottaviano
Position of Hip Resurfacing Component Affects Strain and Resistance to Fracture in the Femoral Neck
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2008; 90(9): 1951 - 1960.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. P. Cobb, V. Kannan, W. Dandachli, F. Iranpour, K. U. Brust, and A. J. Hart
Learning How to Resurface Cam-Type Femoral Heads with Acceptable Accuracy and Precision: The Role of Computed Tomography-Based Navigation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_3): 57 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. R. Romanowski and M. L. Swank
Imageless Navigation in Hip Resurfacing: Avoiding Component Malposition During the Surgeon Learning Curve
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_3): 65 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
T. M. Seyler, L. P. Lai, D. I. Sprinkle, W. G. Ward, and R. H. Jinnah
Does Computer-Assisted Surgery Improve Accuracy and Decrease the Learning Curve in Hip Resurfacing? A Radiographic Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_3): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. L. Ong, M. T. Manley, and S. M. Kurtz
Have Contemporary Hip Resurfacing Designs Reached Maturity? A Review
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_3): 81 - 88.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. J. Richards, D. Giannitsios, O. L. Huk, D. J. Zukor, T. Steffen, and J. Antoniou
Risk of Periprosthetic Femoral Neck Fracture After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Valgus Compared with Anatomic Alignment. A Biomechanical and Clinical Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_3): 96 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. Williams, I. Leslie, G. Isaac, Z. Jin, E. Ingham, and J. Fisher
Tribology and Wear of Metal-on-Metal Hip Prostheses: Influence of Cup Angle and Head Position
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_3): 111 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. Shimmin, P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 637 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. C. Amstutz, J. T. Antoniades, and M. J. Le Duff
Results of Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Hip Resurfacing for Crowe Type-I and II Developmental Dysplasia
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 339 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P. E. Beaule, P. Campbell, Z. Lu, K. Leunig-Ganz, M. Beck, M. Leunig, and R. Ganz
Vascularity of the Arthritic Femoral Head and Hip Resurfacing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 2006; 88(suppl_4): 85 - 96.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. H. Huo and N. F. Gilbert
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2005; 87(9): 2133 - 2146.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. K. Sayana, R. A. Brand, J. D. Heckman, and J. Scott
The Least Publishable Unit * R.A. Brand, J.D. Heckman, and J. Scott reply:
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 679 - 680.
[Full Text]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Untitled
Paul E. Beaule, M.D., FRCSC, et al.
JBJS Online, 21 Mar 2005 [Full text]