This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 9: Topics of Interest in Hip Arthroplasty
CME 3: July, August, September 2004
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, P.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W.-E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hsieh, P.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Yang, W.-E
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Hip
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1989-1997 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Two-Stage Revision Hip Arthroplasty for Infection: Comparison Between the Interim Use of Antibiotic-Loaded Cement Beads and a Spacer Prosthesis

Pang-Hsin Hsieh, MD1, Chun-Hsiung Shih, MD1, Yu-Han Chang, MD1, Mel S. Lee, MD1, Hsin-Nung Shih, MD1 and Wen-E Yang, MD1

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Hsing Street 333, Kweishian, Taoyuan, Taiwan. E-mail address for P.-H. Hsieh: hsiehph{at}adm.cgmh.org.tw

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, and the Department of Orthopedics, Chung Shan Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: A two-stage revision is a well-accepted method for the treatment of a deep infection of a hip with a joint implant. In the present study, the results associated with the interim use of antibiotic-loaded cement beads were compared with those associated with the interim use of an antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis.

Methods: One hundred and twenty-eight consecutive patients who were managed with a two-stage revision hip arthroplasty for the treatment of an infection were followed clinically and radiographically for an average of 4.9 years. Cement beads were implanted following resection arthroplasty in the first seventy hips, and a custom cement prosthesis was implanted in the subsequent fifty-eight hips.

Results: There was no evidence of recurrent infection in 122 patients (95.3%); the infection-free rates in both groups were similar. The use of a spacer prosthesis was associated with a higher hip score, a shorter hospital stay, and better walking capacity in the interim period; a decreased operative time, less blood loss, and a lower transfusion requirement at the time of reimplantation; and fewer postoperative dislocations.

Conclusions: The present study supports the safety and efficacy of the routine use of an antibiotic-loaded cement prosthesis in the interim between the stages of a two-stage revision procedure for the treatment of an infection at the site of a hip arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
P.-H. Hsieh, K.-C. Huang, P.-C. Lee, and M. S. Lee
Two-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty using an antibiotic-loaded spacer: retrospective comparison between short-term and prolonged antibiotic therapy
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2009; 64(2): 392 - 397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
C. Jacobs, C. P. Christensen, and M. E. Berend
Static and Mobile Antibiotic-impregnated Cement Spacers for the Management of Prosthetic Joint Infection
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., June 1, 2009; 17(6): 356 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Q. Cui, W. M. Mihalko, J. S. Shields, M. Ries, and K. J. Saleh
Antibiotic-Impregnated Cement Spacers for the Treatment of Infection Associated with Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2007; 89(4): 871 - 882.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.Home page
J. Kelm, T. Regitz, E. Schmitt, W. Jung, and K. Anagnostakos
In Vivo and In Vitro Studies of Antibiotic Release from and Bacterial Growth Inhibition by Antibiotic-Impregnated Polymethylmethacrylate Hip Spacers
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., January 1, 2006; 50(1): 332 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]