This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
 Adult Knee Reconstruction Test 6: Topics in Total Knee Arthroplasty
CME 3: July, August, September 2004
Basic Science Test 4: Recent Topics in Basic Science
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rubash, H. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, G.
Right arrow Articles by Rubash, H. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Basic Science
Right arrow Adult Knee
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1721-1729 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Knee Kinematics with a High-Flexion Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Prosthesis: An in Vitro Robotic Experimental Investigation

Guoan Li, PhD1, Ephrat Most, MS1, Peter G. Sultan, MD1, Steve Schule, MD1, Shay Zayontz, MD1, Sang Eun Park, MD1 and Harry E. Rubash, MD1

1 Bioengineering Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, GRJ 1215, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail address for G. Li: gli1{at}partners.org

Investigation performed at the Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Zimmer, Inc. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: An analysis of contemporary total knee arthroplasty reveals that, on the average, patients rarely flex the knee beyond 120°. The biomechanical mechanisms that inhibit further flexion after total knee arthroplasty are unknown. The objective of the present study was to investigate the capability of a single design of a fixed-bearing, high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty system (LPS-Flex) to restore the range of flexion to that of the intact knee.

Methods: Thirteen cadaveric human knees were tested, with use of a robotic testing system, before and after total knee arthroplasty with the LPS-Flex prosthesis. The passive path and the kinematics under an isolated quadriceps force of 400 N, under an isolated hamstring force of 200 N, and with these forces combined were determined. Posterior femoral translation of the lateral and medial femoral condyles and tibial rotation were recorded from 0° to 150° of flexion.

Results: The medial and lateral condyles of the intact knee translated posteriorly from full extension to 150°, reaching a mean peak (and standard deviation) of 22.9 ± 11.3 mm and 31.9 ± 12.5 mm, respectively, under the combined muscle forces. Following total knee arthroplasty, the amount of posterior femoral translation was lower than that observed in the intact knee. At 150°, approximately 90% of the intact posterior femoral translation was recovered by the total knee replacement. Internal tibial rotation was observed for all knees throughout the range of motion. The camspine mechanism engaged at approximately 80° and disengaged at 135°. Despite the absence of cam-spine engagement, further posterior femoral translation occurred from 135° to 150°.

Conclusions: The tibiofemoral articular geometry of the intact knee and the knee after total knee arthroplasty with use of the LPS-Flex design demonstrated similar kinematics at high flexion angles. The cam-spine mechanism enhanced posterior femoral translation only at the mid-range of flexion. The femoral component geometry of the LPS-Flex total knee prosthesis may improve posterior tibiofemoral articulation contact in high flexion angles.

Clinical Relevance: Although sufficient posterior femoral translation and tibial rotation were restored following total knee arthroplasty with the LPS-Flex prosthesis, these conditions alone may not be sufficient to fully produce the amount of knee flexion that is observed in the intact knee. The clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty may be affected by other factors, such as preoperative range of motion, flexion space balancing, posterior tibiofemoral articular contact stability, quadriceps contraction, and patient motivation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
G. Li, J. Suggs, G. Hanson, S. Durbhakula, T. Johnson, and A. Freiberg
Three-Dimensional Tibiofemoral Articular Contact Kinematics of a Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 395 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
Y.-H. Kim, K.-S. Sohn, and J.-S. Kim
Range of Motion of Standard and High-Flexion Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Prostheses. A Prospective, Randomized Study
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1470 - 1475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]