This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
CME 3: July, August, September 2004
Basic Science Test 4: Recent Topics in Basic Science
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JBJS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muschler, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Muschler, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Griffith, L. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Basic Science
Right arrow Current Concepts Review
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1541-1558 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Current Concepts Review

Engineering Principles of Clinical Cell-Based Tissue Engineering

George F. Muschler, MD1, Chizu Nakamoto, MD, PhD1 and Linda G. Griffith, PhD2

1 Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering (A41), The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195. E-mail address for G.F. Muschler: muschlg{at}ccf.org
2 Biotechnology Process Engineering Center, MIT 16-429, Cambridge, MA 02139

Investigation performed at the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, and the Departments of Biological Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received National Institutes of Health Grant R01 AR42997. G.F. Muschler has consulting/research relationships with several biotechnology companies, including DePuy, Stryker Biotech, Therics, and Athersys in the fields of stem cell biology and tissue engineering. L.G. Griffith has consulting/research relationships with Therics and DuPont in the area of stem cell biology and tissue engineering. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Tissue engineering is a rapidly evolving discipline that seeks to repair, replace, or regenerate specific tissues or organs by translating fundamental knowledge in physics, chemistry, and biology into practical and effective materials, devices, systems, and clinical strategies.

Stem cells and progenitors that are capable of forming new tissue with one or more connective tissue phenotypes are available from many adult tissues and are defined as connective tissue progenitors. There are four major cell-based tissue-engineering strategies: (1) targeting local connective tissue progenitors where new tissue is desired, (2) transplanting autogenous connective tissue progenitors, (3) transplanting culture-expanded or modified connective tissue progenitors, and (4) transplanting fully formed tissue generated in vitro or in vivo.

Stem cell function is controlled by changes in stem cell activation and self-renewal or by changes in the proliferation, migration, differentiation, or survival of the progeny of stem cell activation, the downstream progenitor cells.

Three-dimensional porous scaffolds promote new tissue formation by providing a surface and void volume that promotes the attachment, migration, proliferation, and desired differentiation of connective tissue progenitors throughout the region where new tissue is needed. Critical variables in scaffold design and function include the bulk material or materials from which it is made, the three-dimensional architecture, the surface chemistry, the mechanical properties, the initial environment in the area of the scaffold, and the late scaffold environment, which is often determined by degradation characteristics.

Local presentation or delivery of bioactive molecules can change the function of connective tissue progenitors (activation, proliferation, migration, differentiation, or survival) in a manner that results in new or enhanced local tissue formation.

All cells require access to substrate molecules (oxygen, glucose, and amino acids). A balance between consumption and local delivery of these substrates is needed if cells are to survive. Transplanted cells are particularly vulnerable. Theoretical calculations can be used to explore the relationships among cell density, diffusion distance, and cell viability within a graft and to design improved strategies for transplantation of connective tissue progenitors.

Rational strategies for tissue engineering seek to optimize new tissue formation through the logical selection of conditions that modulate the performance of connective tissue progenitors in a graft site to produce a desired tissue. This increasingly involves strategies that combine cells, matrices, inductive stimuli, and techniques that enhance the survival and performance of local or transplanted connective tissue progenitors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Cellular Strategies for Enhancement of Fracture Repair
Thomas E. Patterson, Ken Kumagai, Linda Griffith, and George F. Muschler
JBJS 2008 90: 111-119. [Abstract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. M. Novicoff, A. Manaswi, M. V. Hogan, S. M. Brubaker, W. M. Mihalko, and K. J. Saleh
Critical Analysis of the Evidence for Current Technologies in Bone-Healing and Repair
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_1): 85 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Stem CellsHome page
V. H. Fan, A. Au, K. Tamama, R. Littrell, L. B. Richardson, J. W. Wright, A. Wells, and L. G. Griffith
Tethered Epidermal Growth Factor Provides a Survival Advantage to Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Stem Cells, May 1, 2007; 25(5): 1241 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
W. G. De Long Jr., T. A. Einhorn, K. Koval, M. McKee, W. Smith, R. Sanders, and T. Watson
Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery. A Critical Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2007; 89(3): 649 - 658.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. S. Kaplan, D. L. Glaser, E. M. Shore, R. J. Pignolo, M. Xu, Y. Zhang, D. Senitzer, S. J. Forman, and S. G. Emerson
Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Contribution to Ectopic Skeletogenesis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2007; 89(2): 347 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Ph. Hernigou, A. Poignard, F. Beaujean, and H. Rouard
Percutaneous Autologous Bone-Marrow Grafting for Nonunions. Influence of the Number and Concentration of Progenitor Cells
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1430 - 1437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]