The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1446-1451 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Preoperative Factors Associated with Improvements in Shoulder Function After Humeral Hemiarthroplasty
Carolyn M. Hettrich, MD1,
Edward Weldon, III, MD2,
Richard S. Boorman, MD3,
I. Moby Parsons, IV, MD4 and
Frederick A. Matsen, III, MD1
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Box
356500, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195-7660. E-mail address for
F.A. Matsen:
matsen{at}u.washington.edu
2 Bone and Joint Center, Straub Hospital and Clinic, 888 South King Street,
Honolulu, HI 96813
3 50 Royal Oak Point NW, Calgary, AL T3G 5C5, Canada
4 Seacoast Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, 237 Route 108, Somersworth, NH
03878
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Sports
Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from DePuy Orthopaedics
Inc., in support of the Douglas T. Harryman II/DePuy Endowed Chair for
Shoulder Research at the University of Washington. None of the authors
received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide
such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed,
or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with
which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: The relationship between the characteristics of the
shoulder that can be determined before humeral hemiarthroplasty and the
functional improvement after surgery is not known. The goal of this study was
to test the hypothesis that the functional outcome of this procedure
correlated significantly with factors that are identifiable
preoperatively.
Methods: The study group included seventy-one shoulders in
sixty-eight patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty, performed by the same
surgeon, for diagnoses other than acute fracture. The mean age of the patients
was sixty-one years (range, thirty to eighty-three years). The results were
characterized in terms of the change in self-assessed shoulder function and
general health status at an average of forty-nine months (range, twenty-four
to 142 months) after surgery.
Results: The preoperative absence of erosion of the glenoid was
associated with greater improvement in shoulder function and level of comfort
after hemiarthroplasty (p < 0.001). Shoulders that had not had previous
surgery had greater functional improvement than did those that had previous
surgery (p = 0.012). Shoulders with an intact rotator cuff showed
significantly (p < 0.5) greater improvement in the ability to lift weight
above shoulder level after hemiarthroplasty (p <0.5). With regard to
diagnoses, shoulders with rheumatoid arthritis, capsulorrhaphy arthropathy,
and cuff tear arthropathy had the least functional improvement, whereas those
with osteonecrosis (p = 0.0004) and with primary (p = 0.02) and secondary
degenerative joint disease (p = 0.03) had the greatest improvement. Patient
age and gender did not significantly affect the outcome.
Conclusions: These results suggest that the functional improvement
following humeral hemiarthroplasty is related to factors that are identifiable
before surgery. These data may be of benefit in preoperative discussions with
patients who have a shoulder disorder and are considering treatment with
hemiarthroplasty.
Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1
(retrospective study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description
of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Saltzman, D. M. Mercer, W. J. Warme, A. L. Bertelsen, and F. A. Matsen III
Comparison of Patients Undergoing Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty Before and After the Age of Fifty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2010;
92(1):
42 - 47.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Harreld, D. R. Marker, E. R. Wiesler, B. Shafiq, and M. A. Mont
Osteonecrosis of the Humeral Head
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
June 1, 2009;
17(6):
345 - 355.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. S. Goldberg, J.-E. Bell, H. J. Kim, S. F. Bak, W. N. Levine, and L. U. Bigliani
Hemiarthroplasty for the Rotator Cuff-Deficient Shoulder
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(3):
554 - 559.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. S. Bailie, P. J. Llinas, and T. S. Ellenbecker
Cementless Humeral Resurfacing Arthroplasty in Active Patients Less Than Fifty-five Years of Age
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2008;
90(1):
110 - 117.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Lynch, A. K. Franta, W. H. Montgomery Jr, T. R. Lenters, D. Mounce, and F. A. Matsen III
Self-Assessed Outcome at Two to Four Years After Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty with Concentric Glenoid Reaming
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2007;
89(6):
1284 - 1292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|