This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
Foot/Ankle Test 3: Surgical Considerations
Pediatrics Test 3: Club Foot/Hip/Spine
CME 2: April, May, June 2004
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huber, H.
Right arrow Articles by Dutoit, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huber, H.
Right arrow Articles by Dutoit, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Foot/Ankle
Right arrow Pediatrics
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1203-1210 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Dynamic Foot-Pressure Measurement in the Assessment of Operatively Treated Clubfeet

Harry Huber, MD1 and Michel Dutoit, MD2

1 Horizon 19, CH-2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland. E-mail address: harrym.huber{at}bluewin.ch
2 Hôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande, University of Lausanne, Avenue Pierre-Decker 4, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Lausanne, Switzerland

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: Decreased motion of the subtalar joint is common after operative treatment of idiopathic clubfeet. The purposes of this study were to validate parameters of dynamic foot-pressure measurement that enable detection of physiological pronation of the subtalar joint and to analyze the consequences of absent or decreased pronation following clubfoot surgery on long-term functional results.

Methods: To validate parameters of dynamic foot-pressure measurement, we initially analyzed two control groups: one of forty asymptomatic normal feet and the other of five feet with a previous subtalar joint arthrodesis. The resulting parameters were then applied to a group of nineteen patients with twenty-four idiopathic clubfeet for whom initial conservative treatment had failed and in whom a posterior surgical release (lengthening of the Achilles tendon and release of the posterior ankle capsule) had been performed at a mean age of twenty months. The mean duration of follow-up was forty-one years. All feet were evaluated radiographically, and the clinical results were assessed with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score.

Results: An interruption in the rise of the pressure-time curve and a short medial deviation of the center of pressure path immediately after heel strike are reliable and objective characteristics of pronation movement of the subtalar joint. Nineteen clubfeet had a demonstrable pronation movement, and five clubfeet did not. The nineteen feet with pronation movement were either asymptomatic (twelve feet) or mildly painful on occasion (seven feet). The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score for the nineteen feet was 87 points. The five feet without pronation movement were moderately painful during strenuous activities only (four feet) or were nearly always painful (one foot). The mean score for those feet was 57 points. There was a significant difference between these two groups with regard to the pain scores and the total scores (p < 0.001), but there was no appreciable difference regarding function and hindfoot motion. It was not possible to distinguish between these two groups on the basis of the findings of the physical or radiographic examinations.

Conclusions: Idiopathic clubfeet with preserved hindfoot pronation have a better long-term prognosis. Preservation of functional mobility of the subtalar joint is a key factor in the treatment of clubfoot deformity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. B. Park, H. W. Park, K. S. Lee, S. Y. Joo, and H. W. Kim
Changes in Dynamic Foot Pressure After Surgical Treatment of Valgus Deformity of the Hindfoot in Cerebral Palsy
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2008; 90(8): 1712 - 1721.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Dynamic Foot Pressure Measurements in Patients with Club Feet
Hasan H Muratli, et al.
JBJS Online, 14 Sep 2004 [Full text]