The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1172-1178 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Complications and Failure After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
Adrienne A. Spirt, MD, PhD1,
Mathieu Assal, MD1 and
Sigvard T. Hansen, Jr., MD1
1 The Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University
of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359798, Seattle, WA 98105. E-mail address
for A.A. Spirt:
aaspirt{at}hotmail.com
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle,
Washington
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this manuscript. One of the authors (S.T.H Jr.)
works as a consultant for DePuy on a "piece-work" basis (expenses
and an honorarium for teaching). That work is unrelated to the present study.
They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement
to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid
or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund,
foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit
organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article,
on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our
subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
Background: Second-generation total ankle arthroplasty has been
reported to have good intermediate-term results. The purpose of the present
study was to report on the cause and frequency of reoperation and failure
after total ankle arthroplasty and to determine demographic and clinical
predictors of reoperation and failure.
Methods: Three hundred and six consecutive primary total ankle
arthroplasties were performed with use of the DePuy Agility Total Ankle System
between 1995 and 2001. At a mean of thirty-three months after the
arthroplasty, we retrospectively reviewed the records with regard to patient
age, gender, the indications for the index procedure, adjuvant procedures, the
timing and frequency of reoperation, and the indications for and the type of
reoperations performed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine the
rate of prosthetic survival, and Cox regression analysis was performed to
determine predictors of reoperation and failure.
Results: Eighty-five patients (28%) underwent 127 reoperations
(involving 168 procedures) after primary total ankle arthroplasty. The most
common procedures at the time of reoperation were débridement of
heterotopic bone (fifty-eight), correction of axial malalignment (forty), and
component replacement (thirty-one). Eight patients underwent below-the-knee
amputation. Age was found to be the only significant predictor of reoperation
and failure after total ankle arthroplasty. The five-year survival rate with
reoperation as the end point was 54%. The five-year survival rate with failure
as the end point was 80% for all patients and 89% for patients who were more
than fifty-four years of age. The prosthesis could not be salvaged in nine
ankles (2.9%); the inability to salvage the prosthesis was most often due to
loosening or infection.
Conclusions: We noted a relatively high rate of reoperation after
total ankle arthroplasty with this second-generation device. Younger age was
found to have a negative effect on the rates of reoperation and failure. Most
prostheses could be salvaged; however, the functional outcome of this
procedure is uncertain.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case
series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a
complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. B. Chou, M. T. Coughlin, S. Hansen Jr, A. Haskell, G. Lundeen, C. L. Saltzman, and R. A. Mann
Osteoarthritis of the Ankle: The Role of Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
May 1, 2008;
16(5):
249 - 259.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Bestic, J. J. Peterson, J. K. DeOrio, L. W. Bancroft, T. H. Berquist, and M. J. Kransdorf
Postoperative Evaluation of the Total Ankle Arthroplasty
Am. J. Roentgenol.,
April 1, 2008;
190(4):
1112 - 1123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Giannini, R. Buda, C. Faldini, F. Vannini, M. Romagnoli, G. Grandi, and R. Bevoni
The Treatment of Severe Posttraumatic Arthritis of the Ankle Joint
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2007;
89(suppl_3):
15 - 28.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Doets, R. Brand, and R. G.H.H. Nelissen
Total Ankle Arthroplasty in Inflammatory Joint Disease with Use of Two Mobile-Bearing Designs
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2006;
88(6):
1272 - 1284.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Trieb
Management of the foot in rheumatoid arthritis
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
September 1, 2005;
87-B(9):
1171 - 1177.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Miller, T. A. DeCoster, and M. S. Mizel
What's New in Foot and Ankle Surgery?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
April 1, 2005;
87(4):
909 - 917.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|