This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the exams for this article: Shoulder/Elbow Test 4: The Elbow: Arthroplasty, Trauma CME 2: April, May, June 2004 An erratum has been published Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Letters to the Editor: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Related articles in JBJS Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Markolf, K. L. Articles by Benhaim, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Markolf, K. L. Articles by Benhaim, P. Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Load-Sharing at the Wrist Following Radial Head Replacement with a Metal Implant

A Cadaveric Study

¹ Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, Rehabilitation Building, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Room 21-67, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail address for K.L. Markolf: kmarkolf{at}mednet.ucla.edu

Investigation performed at the Biomechanics Research Section, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received Grant R01 AR43735 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases/National Institutes of Health. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Methods: A miniature load cell was attached to fifteen fresh-frozen cadaveric forearms to record force in the distal part of the ulna as the wrist was axially loaded to 134 N of compression force. Proximal displacement of the radius relative to the capitellum was also recorded. Loading tests on intact forearms were performed with the elbow in valgus and varus alignment and with three positions of wrist rotation (neutral, 45° of pronation, and 45° of supination). Loading tests were then repeated, with the same positions of varus and valgus elbow alignment and wrist rotation as had been used in the tests of the intact forearm, after radial head excision and subsequent insertion of metal radial head implants that restored anatomical length, implants that produced a radial length that was longer than the anatomical length, and implants that produced a radial length that was shorter than the anatomical length. Testing of these different implant thicknesses was repeated after sectioning of the interosseous membrane.

Results: The mean distal ulnar forces and mean proximal radial displacements following insertion of an implant that restored anatomical length were not significantly different from the corresponding values for the intact forearm. At neutral wrist rotation, replacing that implant with an implant that increased the radial length by 4 mm (after sectioning of the interosseous membrane) decreased the mean distal ulnar force from 13.4% to 3.3% of the applied wrist force with the elbow in valgus alignment and from 29.1% to 8.6% with the elbow in varus alignment. Replacing the implant that restored anatomical length with one that decreased the length by 4 mm (after sectioning of the interosseous membrane) significantly increased the mean distal ulnar force from 13.4% of the applied wrist load to 33.3% with the elbow in valgus alignment and from 29.1% to 51.6% with it in varus alignment. The mean distal ulnar forces were not significantly affected by the position of wrist rotation when the elbow was in valgus alignment. However, when the elbow was in varus alignment, the mean distal ulnar forces associated with all reconstructed radial lengths were significantly higher when the wrist was placed in 45° of supination.

Conclusions: In this cadaveric model, insertion of a metal implant maintained distal ulnar forces at normal levels, at all three positions of wrist rotation, when the radius had been restored to its original anatomical length. Distal ulnar forces and proximal radial displacements were significantly affected by the reconstructed length of the radius.

Clinical Relevance: Radial head implants are utilized to prevent proximal migration of the radius as the wrist is loaded; this is especially important when the interosseous membrane has been ruptured and thus cannot help to limit radial displacement. At the time of surgery, comminution and displacement of a radial head fracture may make estimation of the original radial length difficult. Our results demonstrate that, in terms of distal ulnar loading, it is preferable to insert an implant that is too thick rather than too thin.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Load-Sharing at the Wrist Following Radial Head Replacement with a Metal Implant. A Cadaveric Study • K.L. Markolf replies:

David Ring and Keith L. Markolf
JBJS 2004 86: 2569-2570. [Extract] [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. C. Tejwani and H. Mehta Fractures of the Radial Head and Neck: Current Concepts in Management J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2007; 15(7): 380 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2004 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.