The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1007-1011 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Cementless Acetabular Revision with the Harris-Galante Porous Prosthesis
Results After a Minimum of Ten Years of Follow-up
Brian R. Hallstrom, MD1,
Gregory J. Golladay, MD2,
David A. Vittetoe, MD3 and
William H. Harris, MD4
1 Orthopaedic Surgery Associates, 5315 Elliott Drive, Suite 301, Ypsilanti, MI
48197
2 Chelsea Orthopaedics, 775 South Main Street, Chelsea, MI 48118
3 Des Moines Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 213, Des
Moines, IA 50316
4 Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Biomaterials Laboratory, Massachusetts General
Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, GRJ 1126, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail address:
wharris.obbl{at}partners.org
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
Massachusetts
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from the William H. Harris
Foundation. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity (Zimmer). Also, a commercial entity (Zimmer) paid or
directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation,
educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with
which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Revisions of the acetabular component of a total hip
arthroplasty have a higher rate of complications, particularly loosening and
dislocation, than do primary procedures. The purpose of this study, in which
the results of a consecutive series of revisions performed with the
Harris-Galante Porous acetabular component by a single surgeon were evaluated
at an average of twelve years, was to quantify the complications and outcomes
of acetabular revision.
Methods: Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated to assess
loosening, lysis, radiolucencies, and trochanteric union in 188 hips (170
patients) treated between 1984 and 1990. One hundred and twenty-two hips in
110 patients were followed for at least ten years, which was required for
inclusion in the study. Thirty-one patients (thirty-six hips) died less than
ten years postoperatively, and twenty-nine patients (thirty hips) were lost to
or refused to return for follow-up.
Results: The average Harris hip score was 78 points at an average of
12.5 years after revision, which was a 29-point improvement compared with the
preoperative score. The rate of repeat revision because of aseptic loosening
of the acetabular shell was 4% (five of 122). The rate of repeat revision of
the shell for any reason was 15% (eighteen of 122). Eight unrevised sockets
were loose radiographically, for a total rate of aseptic loosening of 11%
(thirteen of 122).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that most acetabular revisions
with this cementless hemispherical socket were successful. Few structural
grafts and no cages were used.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case
series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a
complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Raman, R. P. Kamath, A. Parikh, and P. D. Angus
Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
August 1, 2005;
87-B(8):
1061 - 1067.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. M. Sporer, W. G. Paprosky, and M. O'Rourke
Managing Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2005;
87(7):
1620 - 1630.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Huo and M. S. Muller
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2004;
86(10):
2341 - 2353.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|