This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 7: Total Hip Arthroplasty Results
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hallstrom, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hallstrom, B. R.
Right arrow Articles by Harris, W. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Hip
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:1007-1011 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Cementless Acetabular Revision with the Harris-Galante Porous Prosthesis

Results After a Minimum of Ten Years of Follow-up

Brian R. Hallstrom, MD1, Gregory J. Golladay, MD2, David A. Vittetoe, MD3 and William H. Harris, MD4

1 Orthopaedic Surgery Associates, 5315 Elliott Drive, Suite 301, Ypsilanti, MI 48197
2 Chelsea Orthopaedics, 775 South Main Street, Chelsea, MI 48118
3 Des Moines Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 213, Des Moines, IA 50316
4 Orthopaedic Biomechanics and Biomaterials Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, GRJ 1126, Boston, MA 02114. E-mail address: wharris.obbl{at}partners.org

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the William H. Harris Foundation. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Zimmer). Also, a commercial entity (Zimmer) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: Revisions of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty have a higher rate of complications, particularly loosening and dislocation, than do primary procedures. The purpose of this study, in which the results of a consecutive series of revisions performed with the Harris-Galante Porous acetabular component by a single surgeon were evaluated at an average of twelve years, was to quantify the complications and outcomes of acetabular revision.

Methods: Clinical and radiographic results were evaluated to assess loosening, lysis, radiolucencies, and trochanteric union in 188 hips (170 patients) treated between 1984 and 1990. One hundred and twenty-two hips in 110 patients were followed for at least ten years, which was required for inclusion in the study. Thirty-one patients (thirty-six hips) died less than ten years postoperatively, and twenty-nine patients (thirty hips) were lost to or refused to return for follow-up.

Results: The average Harris hip score was 78 points at an average of 12.5 years after revision, which was a 29-point improvement compared with the preoperative score. The rate of repeat revision because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular shell was 4% (five of 122). The rate of repeat revision of the shell for any reason was 15% (eighteen of 122). Eight unrevised sockets were loose radiographically, for a total rate of aseptic loosening of 11% (thirteen of 122).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that most acetabular revisions with this cementless hemispherical socket were successful. Few structural grafts and no cages were used.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. Raman, R. P. Kamath, A. Parikh, and P. D. Angus
Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component
J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2005; 87-B(8): 1061 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
S. M. Sporer, W. G. Paprosky, and M. O'Rourke
Managing Bone Loss in Acetabular Revision
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1620 - 1630.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. H. Huo and M. S. Muller
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2004; 86(10): 2341 - 2353.
[Full Text] [PDF]