This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the exams for this article: Spine Test 3: Perioperative Considerations/Diagnostic Modalities/Surgical R... CME 2: April, May, June 2004 [Supplementary Material] Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Letters to the Editor: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Related articles in JBJS Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buttermann, G. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buttermann, G. R. Related Collections Spine Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation: Epidural Steroid Injection Compared with Discectomy

A Prospective, Randomized Study

¹ Midwest Spine Institute, 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard, Stillwater, MN 55082

Investigation performed at Midwest Spine Institute, Stillwater, Minnesota

The author did not receive grants or outside funding in support of his research or preparation of this manuscript. He did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the author is affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

Methods: One hundred and sixty-nine patients with a large herniation of the lumbar nucleus pulposus (a herniation of >25% of the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal) were followed over a three-year period. One hundred patients who had no improvement after a minimum of six weeks of noninvasive treatment were enrolled in a prospective, non-blinded study and were randomly assigned to receive either epidural steroid injection or discectomy. Evaluation was performed with the use of outcomes scales and neurological examination.

Results: Patients who had undergone discectomy had the most rapid decrease in symptoms, with 92% to 98% of the patients reporting that the treatment had been successful over the various follow-up periods. Only 42% to 56% of the fifty patients who had undergone the epidural steroid injection reported that the treatment had been effective. Those who did not obtain relief from the injection had a subsequent discectomy, and their outcomes did not appear to have been adversely affected by the delay in surgery resulting from the trial of epidural steroid injection.

Conclusions: Epidural steroid injection was not as effective as discectomy with regard to reducing symptoms and disability associated with a large herniation of the lumbar disc. However, epidural steroid injection did have a role: it was found to be effective for up to three years by nearly one-half of the patients who had not had improvement with six or more weeks of noninvasive care.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level I-1a (randomized controlled trial [significant difference]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Epidural Steroid Injection Compared with Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation

Robert F. McLain and Glenn R. Buttermann
JBJS 2005 87: 458-459. [Extract] [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. A. Anderson, P. C. McCormick, and P. D. Angevine Randomized Controlled Trials of the Treatment of Lumbar Disk Herniation: 1983-2007 J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., October 1, 2008; 16(10): 566 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Peul, H. C. van Houwelingen, W. B. van den Hout, R. Brand, J. A.H. Eekhof, J. T.J. Tans, R. T.W.M. Thomeer, B. W. Koes, and the Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Surgery versus Prolonged Conservative Treatment for Sciatica N. Engl. J. Med., May 31, 2007; 356(22): 2245 - 2256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. A. Young, G. S. Hyman, L. N. Packia-Raj, and A. J. Cole The Use of Lumbar Epidural/Transforaminal Steroids for Managing Spinal Disease J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., April 1, 2007; 15(4): 228 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. N. Weinstein, T. D. Tosteson, J. D. Lurie, A. N. A. Tosteson, B. Hanscom, J. S. Skinner, W. A. Abdu, A. S. Hilibrand, S. D. Boden, and R. A. Deyo Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation: The Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT): A Randomized Trial JAMA, November 22, 2006; 296(20): 2441 - 2450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Carragee Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Disk Disorders JAMA, November 22, 2006; 296(20): 2485 - 2487. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Rhee, M. Schaufele, and W. A. Abdu Radiculopathy and the Herniated Lumbar Disc. Controversies Regarding Pathophysiology and Management J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2006; 88(9): 2070 - 2080. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., September 1, 2004; 9(5): e5 - e5. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Surgery vs. Epidural Steroids for Lumbar Disc Herniation Journal Watch (General), May 7, 2004; 2004(507): 2 - 2. [Full Text]

				Minerva BMJ, May 1, 2004; 328(7447): 1084 - 1084. [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2004 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.