This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
Adult Knee Reconstruction Test 5: Knee Arthroplasty
CME 1: January, February, March 2004
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernigou, P.
Right arrow Articles by Deschamps, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernigou, P.
Right arrow Articles by Deschamps, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Adult Knee
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:506-511 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Posterior Slope of the Tibial Implant and the Outcome of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Philippe Hernigou, MD1 and Gerard Deschamps, MD2

1 University Paris XII, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 94010 Creteil, France
2 Clinique de Dracy, 71640 Dracy Le Fort, France

Investigation performed at Hôpital Henri Mondor, Creteil, France

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).


Background: Laboratory studies have suggested that the sagittal displacements permitted by a knee replacement are influenced by the posterior slope of the tibial implant. The effect of the posterior slope of the tibial implant on the outcome of unicompartmental arthroplasty is not well known. The purpose of the present study was to assess the effect of the posterior slope on the long-term outcome of unicompartmental arthroplasty in knees with intact and deficient anterior cruciate ligaments.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of ninety-nine unicompartmental arthroplasties after a mean duration of follow-up of sixteen years. At the time of the arthroplasty, the anterior cruciate ligament was considered to be normal in fifty knees, damaged in thirty-one, and absent in eighteen. At the most recent follow-up, we measured the posterior tibial slope and the anterior tibial translation on standing lateral radiographs. The anteroposterior stability of seventy-seven knees that had not been revised by the time of the most recent follow-up was evaluated clinically.

Results: In the group of seventy-seven knees that had not been revised by the time of the most recent follow-up, there was a significant linear relationship between anterior tibial translation (mean, 3.7 mm) and posterior tibial slope (mean, 4.3°) (p < 0.01). The mean posterior slope of the tibial implant was significantly less in the group of seventy-seven knees without loosening of the implant than it was in the group of seventeen knees with loosening of the implant (p < 0.05). Five ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament occurred in knees in which the ligament had been considered to be normal at the time of implantation; the posterior tibial slope in these five knees was ≥13°. Clinical evaluation revealed normal or nearly normal anteroposterior stability at the time of the most recent follow-up in all sixty-six unrevised knees in which the anterior cruciate ligament had been present at the time of implantation. Of the eighteen knees in which the anterior cruciate ligament had been absent at the time of the arthroplasty, eleven still had the implant in situ at the time of the most recent follow-up; the mean posterior tibial slope in these eleven knees was <5°. Seven knees in which the anterior cruciate ligament had been absent at the time of the arthroplasty were revised. In these knees, the tibial prosthesis was implanted with a posterior slope of >8°.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that >7° of posterior slope of the tibial implant should be avoided, particularly if the anterior cruciate ligament is absent at the time of implantation. An intact anterior cruciate ligament, even when partly degenerated, was associated with the maintenance of normal anteroposterior stability of the knee for an average of sixteen years following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. D. Pearle, D. Kendoff, and V. Musahl
Perspectives on Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery: Movement Toward Quantitative Orthopaedic Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_1): 7 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. A. Conditt and M. W. Roche
Minimally Invasive Robotic-Arm-Guided Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_1): 63 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
T. Borus and T. Thornhill
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2008; 16(1): 9 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. D. Naal, M. Fischer, A. Preuss, J. Goldhahn, F. von Knoch, S. Preiss, U. Munzinger, and T. Drobny
Return to Sports and Recreational Activity After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 35(10): 1688 - 1695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. Archibeck and R. E. White Jr.
What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1656 - 1666.
[Full Text] [PDF]