This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
CME 4: October, November, December 2004
Pediatrics Test 6: Topics in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kocaoglu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cakmak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kocaoglu, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cakmak, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pediatrics
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2004;86:2406-2411
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Complications Encountered During Lengthening Over an Intramedullary Nail

Mehmet Kocaoglu, MD1, Levent Eralp, MD1, Onder Kilicoglu, MD1, Halil Burc, MD2 and Mehmet Cakmak, MD1

1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul University, Çapa, 34390, Topkapi, Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail address for L. Eralp: yeralp{at}superonline.com
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Lütfi Kyrdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, 81040 Goztepe, Istanbul, Turkey

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul University, Istanbul, and the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Lütfi Kyrdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.


Background: In limb-lengthening, the quest for increased patient comfort and a reduced period of external fixation has led to techniques such as lengthening over an intramedullary nail. The goals of this study were to investigate the rate and types of complications encountered during lengthening over an intramedullary nail and to identify solutions to these complications.

Methods: Forty-two segments (thirty-five femora and seven tibiae) in thirty-five patients were lengthened. The mean age of the patients was 26.6 years, the mean amount lengthened was 6.3 cm (range, 2.5 to 11.5 cm), the mean external fixation index was 18.7 days/cm, and the mean lengthening index was 31.2 days/cm. The patients were followed for a mean period of forty-four months postoperatively.

Results: Eighteen complications occurred in sixteen (38%) of the forty-two segments for a rate of 0.43 complication per segment. Complications were classified, according to the system of Paley et al., as two problems, thirteen obstacles, and three sequelae. Sixteen of them required additional surgical interventions. A preoperative score of >6.5 on the system of Paley et al., a lengthening of >6 cm, and a lengthening percentage of >21.5% of the original bone length were indicators of a higher probability of the occurrence of complications.

Conclusions: Lengthening over an intramedullary nail provides increased patient comfort and reduces the external fixation period. If the problems encountered are treated aggressively, the result of the treatment can be quite satisfactory.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. Eralp, M. Kocaoglu, and H. Rashid
Reconstruction of Segmental Bone Defects Due to Chronic Osteomyelitis with Use of an External Fixator and an Intramedullary Nail. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2007; 89(2_suppl_2): 183 - 195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. Kocaoglu, L. Eralp, H. u. Rashid, C. Sen, and K. Bilsel
Reconstruction of Segmental Bone Defects Due to Chronic Osteomyelitis with Use of an External Fixator and an Intramedullary Nail
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2006; 88(10): 2137 - 2145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. S. Kocher and P. O. Newton
What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedics
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2005; 87(5): 1171 - 1179.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Femoral Lengthening Over an Intramedullary Nail
Ashok Acharya
JBJS Online, 31 Jan 2005 [Full text]
Dr. Eralp and colleagues respond to Dr. Acharya
Levent Eralp, et al.
JBJS Online, 31 Jan 2005 [Full text]