The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American). 2004;86:2406-2411
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Complications Encountered During Lengthening Over an Intramedullary Nail
Mehmet Kocaoglu, MD1,
Levent Eralp, MD1,
Onder Kilicoglu, MD1,
Halil Burc, MD2 and
Mehmet Cakmak, MD1
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul
University, Çapa, 34390, Topkapi, Istanbul, Turkey. E-mail address for
L. Eralp:
yeralp{at}superonline.com
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Lütfi K rdar
Kartal Training and Research Hospital, 81040 Goztepe, Istanbul, Turkey
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics and
Traumatology, Istanbul Medical School, Istanbul University, Istanbul, and the
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Dr. Lütfi K rdar
Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or
other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: In limb-lengthening, the quest for increased patient
comfort and a reduced period of external fixation has led to techniques such
as lengthening over an intramedullary nail. The goals of this study were to
investigate the rate and types of complications encountered during lengthening
over an intramedullary nail and to identify solutions to these
complications.
Methods: Forty-two segments (thirty-five femora and seven tibiae) in
thirty-five patients were lengthened. The mean age of the patients was 26.6
years, the mean amount lengthened was 6.3 cm (range, 2.5 to 11.5 cm), the mean
external fixation index was 18.7 days/cm, and the mean lengthening index was
31.2 days/cm. The patients were followed for a mean period of forty-four
months postoperatively.
Results: Eighteen complications occurred in sixteen (38%) of the
forty-two segments for a rate of 0.43 complication per segment. Complications
were classified, according to the system of Paley et al., as two problems,
thirteen obstacles, and three sequelae. Sixteen of them required additional
surgical interventions. A preoperative score of >6.5 on the system of Paley
et al., a lengthening of >6 cm, and a lengthening percentage of >21.5%
of the original bone length were indicators of a higher probability of the
occurrence of complications.
Conclusions: Lengthening over an intramedullary nail provides
increased patient comfort and reduces the external fixation period. If the
problems encountered are treated aggressively, the result of the treatment can
be quite satisfactory.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case
series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a
complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Eralp, M. Kocaoglu, and H. Rashid
Reconstruction of Segmental Bone Defects Due to Chronic Osteomyelitis with Use of an External Fixator and an Intramedullary Nail. Surgical Technique
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2007;
89(2_suppl_2):
183 - 195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Kocaoglu, L. Eralp, H. u. Rashid, C. Sen, and K. Bilsel
Reconstruction of Segmental Bone Defects Due to Chronic Osteomyelitis with Use of an External Fixator and an Intramedullary Nail
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2006;
88(10):
2137 - 2145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. S. Kocher and P. O. Newton
What's New in Pediatric Orthopaedics
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2005;
87(5):
1171 - 1179.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Femoral Lengthening Over an Intramedullary Nail
- Ashok Acharya
- JBJS Online, 31 Jan 2005
[Full text]
- Dr. Eralp and colleagues respond to Dr. Acharya
- Levent Eralp, et al.
- JBJS Online, 31 Jan 2005
[Full text]
|