This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
 Shoulder/Elbow Test 6: Topics About the Shoulder
CME 4: October, November, December 2004
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sperling, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schleck, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sperling, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Schleck, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sports
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:2212-2215 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Fifty Years of Age and Younger

John W. Sperling, MD1, Robert H. Cofield, MD1 and Cathy Schleck, BS1

1 Departments of Orthopedic Surgery (J.W.S. and R.H.C.) and Biostatistics (C.S.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail address for J.W. Sperling: sperling.john{at}mayo.edu

Investigation performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Currently, there is no information on the long-term results of rotator cuff repair in young patients. The purpose of the present study was to determine the results, the risk factors for an unsatisfactory outcome, and the rates of failure of this procedure in patients fifty years of age and younger.

Methods: Thirty-two patients (thirty-six shoulders) who were fifty years of age or younger underwent repair of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear between 1976 and 1987. Seven patients (seven shoulders) died after less than thirteen years of follow-up. The remaining twenty-nine shoulders, which had been followed for a minimum of thirteen years or until revision surgery, were included in the analysis. The most recent follow-up was performed in the clinic for five shoulders and by means of a questionnaire for twenty-four shoulders.

Results: There were three small, fifteen medium, six large, and five massive tears. Rotator cuff repair was associated with significant long-term pain relief (p = 0.0001). However, there was no significant long-term improvement in active abduction or external rotation. Postoperative pain, active abduction, and external rotation did not vary significantly according to gender, tear size, repair type, or whether a distal clavicular excision had been performed. There were eleven excellent, five satisfactory, and thirteen unsatisfactory results. Seven shoulders had additional surgery for the treatment of a recurrent tear (five), instability (one), or osteoarthritis (one). Three of the five repairs that were done for the treatment of a recurrent tear were performed ten years or more after the time of the index procedure.

Conclusions: Rotator cuff repair in young patients is associated with long-term pain relief. However, this procedure is not associated with significant long-term improvement in motion, and a large proportion of patients have an unsatisfactory long-term result. The results of rotator cuff repair in young patients appear to be less favorable than those in a mixed-age population.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. P. Burns, S. J. Snyder, and M. Albritton
Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Triple-Loaded Anchors, Suture Shuttles, and Suture Savers
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., July 1, 2007; 15(7): 432 - 444.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J Sports MedHome page
B. R. Wolf, W. R. Dunn, and R. W. Wright
Indications for Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 2007; 35(6): 1007 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
B. Fuchs, M. K. Gilbart, J. Hodler, and C. Gerber
Clinical and Structural Results of Open Repair of an Isolated One-Tendon Tear of the Rotator Cuff
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2006; 88(2): 309 - 316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]