The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:9-14 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
The Cumulative Long-Term Risk of Dislocation After Primary Charnley Total Hip Arthroplasty
Daniel J. Berry, MD1,
Marius von Knoch, MD1,
Cathy D. Schleck, BS1 and
W. Scott Harmsen, MS1
1 Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail address for
D.J. Berry:
berry.daniel{at}mayo.edu
Investigation performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester,
Minnesota
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this work. One or more of the authors received
payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such
benefits from a commercial entity (DePuy). In addition, a commercial entity
(DePuy) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research
fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit
organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: A widely variable prevalence of dislocation after total
hip arthroplasty has been reported, partly because of varying durations of
follow-up for this specific end-point. The effect of demographic factors on
the long-term risk of dislocation as a function of time after total hip
arthroplasty is not well understood. The purpose of the present study was to
determine the risk of dislocation as a function of time after Charnley total
hip arthroplasty and to investigate the demographic factors that influence the
cumulative risk of dislocation.
Methods: Six thousand six hundred and twenty-three consecutive
primary Charnley total hip arthroplasties were performed in 5459 patients at
one institution between 1969 and 1984. The patients included 2869 female
patients and 2590 male patients with a mean age of sixty-three years. All
procedures were performed with a 22-mm femoral head, and all femoral and
acetabular components were fixed with cement. The patients were followed at
routine intervals and were specifically queried about dislocation. The
cumulative risk of dislocation was calculated with use of the Kaplan-Meier
method.
Results: Three hundred and twenty hips (4.8%) dislocated. The
cumulative risk of a first-time dislocation was 1% at one month and 1.9% at
one year and then rose at a constant rate of approximately 1% every five years
to 7% at twenty-five years for patients who were alive and had not had a
revision by that time. Multivariate analysis revealed that the relative risk
of dislocation for female patients (as compared with male patients) was 2.1
and that the relative risk for patients who were seventy years old or more (as
compared with those who were less than seventy years old) was 1.3. Three
underlying diagnosesosteonecrosis of the femoral head, acute fracture
or nonunion of the proximal part of the femur, and inflammatory
arthritiswere associated with a significantly greater risk of
dislocation than osteoarthritis was.
Conclusions: The cumulative long-term risk of dislocation after
total hip arthroplasty is considerably greater than has been reported in
short-term studies. The incidence of dislocation is highest in the first year
after arthroplasty and then continues at a relatively constant rate for the
life of the arthroplasty. Patients at highest risk are female patients and
those with a diagnosis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head or an acute
fracture or nonunion of the proximal part of the femur.
Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1
(retrospective study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description
of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Facebook Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R.M.D Meek, D.B. Allan, G. McPhillips, L. Kerr, C.R. Howie, and From the Scottish Arthroplasty Project
Late Dislocation after Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clin. Med. Res.,
May 1, 2008;
6(1):
17 - 23.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Parvizi, E. Picinic, and P. F. Sharkey
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Instability: Surgical Techniques and Principles
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2008;
90(5):
1134 - 1142.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Pulido, C. Restrepo, and J. Parvizi
Late Instability Following Total Hip Arthroplasty
Clin. Med. Res.,
June 1, 2007;
5(2):
139 - 142.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Sanchez-Sotelo, G. J. Haidukewych, and C. J. Boberg
Hospital Cost of Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2006;
88(2):
290 - 294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Berry, M. von Knoch, C. D. Schleck, and W. S. Harmsen
Effect of Femoral Head Diameter and Operative Approach on Risk of Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2005;
87(11):
2456 - 2463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Trochanteric non union and dislocation
- William H Goude, et al.
- JBJS Online, 6 Jul 2004
[Full text]
|