This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Togawa, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Togawa, D.
Right arrow Articles by Sakai, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Spine
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:70-79 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Lumbar Intervertebral Body Fusion Cages: Histological Evaluation of Clinically Failed Cages Retrieved from Humans

Daisuke Togawa, MD, PhD1, Thomas W. Bauer, MD, PhD1, Isador H. Lieberman, MD, MBA, FRCS(C)1 and Hiroshige Sakai, MD, PhD1

1 Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (D.T., T.W.B., I.H.L., and H.S.) and Pathology (D.T., T.W.B., and H.S.), The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195

Investigation performed at the Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery and Pathology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from DePuy-AcroMed and Medtronic Sofamor Danek. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

Background: Although interbody cages are widely used, there is little histological documentation of the tissue within cages in the human spine. The purpose of this study was to describe the contents of retrieved, clinically failed, interbody cages from human patients, with special reference to the influence of graft type on the viability of bone in the cages.

Methods: Seventy-eight cages that had been retrieved from forty-eight patients were analyzed. There were eight carbon-fiber cages and seventy threaded metal cages. Of the sixty-seven cages for which information about grafting was available, fifty-six had been packed with autograft only, six had local autograft mixed with demineralized bone matrix, four had allograft, and one had demineralized bone matrix only. The indications for cage retrieval included a failed fusion, malposition or migration of the cage, trauma (a compression fracture at the fusion site), low-back pain, progressive spondylosis, nerve-root impingement, and/or infection. The cages had been in situ for an average of twenty-two months. Undecalcified sections through the center of each plastic embedded cage were reviewed, and the approximate areas occupied by viable bone, necrotic bone, fibrocartilage, hyaline cartilage, fibrous tissue, and graft substitute were visually estimated. Debris particles were estimated by a semiquantitative scoring system.

Results: Seventy-one of the seventy-eight cages showed evidence of vascular ingrowth and areas of histologically viable bone, representing incorporating bone graft. The average area occupied by viable bone was 44% (range, 0% to 80%). In some cages, relatively large fragments of cortical bone graft were associated with only minimal new-bone formation. Fibrocartilage occupied up to 50% of the available area in these failed cages. Some cages also contained small fibrocartilage seams connecting segments of bone in a pattern that suggested motion in vivo. In thirty-one of the seventy-eight cages, ≥5% of the available area was occupied by hyaline cartilage, probably from vertebral end plates or facet joints.

Conclusions: While this study was not designed to test the efficacy of cages or of bone graft, the prevalence of hyaline and fibrocartilage in these failed cages illustrates the importance of graft and graft-site preparation to maximize bone-graft incorporation.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?