The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 86:28-39 (2004)
© 2004 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Surface Arthroplasty: Two to Six-Year Follow-up Study
Harlan C. Amstutz, MD1,
Paul E. Beaulé, MD, FRCSC1,
Frederick J. Dorey, PhD1,
Michel J. Le Duff, MA1,
Pat A. Campbell, PhD1 and
Thomas A. Gruen, MS1
1 Joint Replacement Institute, Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street,
Los Angeles, CA 90007. E-mail address for H.C. Amstutz:
jortega{at}laoh.ucla.edu
Investigation performed at the Joint Replacement Institute at
Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more
of the authors received grants or outside funding from the Los Angeles
Orthopaedic Hospital Foundation and the William G. McGowan Charitable Fund,
Inc. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other
benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity (Wright Medical Technology, Inc.). Also, a commercial entity
(Wright Medical Technology, Inc.) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or
other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are
affiliated or associated.
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article,
on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our
subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
A video supplement to this article is available from the Video Jour-
nal of Orthopaedics. A video clip is available at the JBJS web site,
www.jbjs.org. The Video Journal of Orthopaedics can be contacted
at (805) 962-3410, web site: www.vjortho.com.
Background: Following the reintroduction of metal-on-metal
articulating surfaces for total hip arthroplasty in Europe in 1988, we
developed a surface arthroplasty prosthetic system using a metal-on-metal
articulation. The present study describes the clinical and radiographic
results of the first 400 hips treated with metal-on-metal hybrid surface
arthroplasties at an average follow-up of three and a half years.
Methods: Between November 1996 and November 2000, 400 metal-on-metal
hybrid surface arthroplasties were performed in 355 patients. All femoral head
components were cemented, but only fifty-nine of the short metaphyseal stems
were cemented. The patients had an average age of forty-eight years, 73% were
men, and 66% had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Clinical and radiographic
follow-up were performed at three months postoperatively and yearly
thereafter.
Results: The majority of the patients returned to a high level of
activity, including sports, and 54% had activity scores of >7 on the
University of California at Los Angeles activity assessment system.
Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves demonstrated that the rate of survival of the
components at four years was 94.4%. For patients with a surface arthroplasty
risk index score of >3, the rate of survival of the components at four
years was 89% compared with a rate of 97% for those with a score of 3. The
patients with a higher risk index were 4.2 times more likely to undergo
revision to a total hip replacement at four years. Twelve hips (3%) had a
revision to a total hip replacement. Seven of the twelve hips were revised
because of loosening of the femoral component, and three were revised because
of a femoral neck fracture. Substantial radiolucencies were seen around
sixteen uncemented metaphyseal femoral stems. No femoral radiolucencies were
observed among the hips in which the metaphyseal stem was cemented. The most
important risk factors for femoral component loosening and substantial stem
radiolucencies were large femoral head cysts (p = 0.029), patient height (p =
0.032), female gender (p = 0.005), and smaller component size in male patients
(p = 0.005).
Conclusions: The preliminary experience with this hybrid
metal-on-metal bearing is encouraging. Optimal femoral bone preparation and
component fixation are critical to improving durability. The metal-on-metal
hybrid surface arthroplasty is easily revised to a standard femoral component
if necessary.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case
series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a
complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Shimmin, P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2008;
90(3):
637 - 654.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Le Duff, H. C. Amstutz, and F. J. Dorey
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing for Obese Patients
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2007;
89(12):
2705 - 2711.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Amstutz, J. T. Antoniades, and M. J. Le Duff
Results of Metal-on-Metal Hybrid Hip Resurfacing for Crowe Type-I and II Developmental Dysplasia
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
February 1, 2007;
89(2):
339 - 346.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Beaule, P. Campbell, Z. Lu, K. Leunig-Ganz, M. Beck, M. Leunig, and R. Ganz
Vascularity of the Arthritic Femoral Head and Hip Resurfacing
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2006;
88(suppl_4):
85 - 96.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Forrest, A. Welch, A.D. Murray, L. Schweiger, J. Hutchison, and G.P. Ashcroft
Femoral Head Viability After Birmingham Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty: Assessment with Use of [18F] Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(suppl_3):
84 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont, T. M. Seyler, D. R. Marker, G. A. Marulanda, and R. E. Delanois
Use of Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Resurfacing for the Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(suppl_3):
90 - 97.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. P. Revell, C. W. McBryde, S. Bhatnagar, P. B. Pynsent, and R. B.C. Treacy
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing in Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2006;
88(suppl_3):
98 - 103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Mont, P. S. Ragland, G. Etienne, T. M. Seyler, and T. P. Schmalzried
Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
August 1, 2006;
14(8):
454 - 463.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. C. B. Pollard, R. P. Baker, S. J. Eastaugh-Waring, and G. C. Bannister
Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: A FIVE- TO SEVEN-YEAR COMPARISON OF HYBRID TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY AND METAL-ON-METAL RESURFACING
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
May 1, 2006;
88-B(5):
592 - 600.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Beaule, P. A. Campbell, R. Hoke, and F. Dorey
Notching of the femoral neck during resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: A VASCULAR STUDY
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
January 1, 2006;
88-B(1):
35 - 39.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. H. Huo and N. F. Gilbert
What's New in Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2005;
87(9):
2133 - 2146.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Beaule, M. Krismer, P. Mayrhofer, S. Wanner, M. Le Duff, M. Mattesich, B. Stoeckl, H. C. Amstutz, and R. Biedermann
EBRA-FCA for measurement of migration of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
May 1, 2005;
87-B(5):
741 - 744.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Sayana, R. A. Brand, J. D. Heckman, and J. Scott
The Least Publishable Unit * R.A. Brand, J.D. Heckman, and J. Scott reply:
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2005;
87(3):
679 - 680.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Back, R. Dalziel, D. Young, and A. Shimmin
Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: AN INDEPENDENT PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF THE FIRST 230 HIPS
J Bone Joint Surg Br,
March 1, 2005;
87-B(3):
324 - 329.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. C. Amstutz, P. A. Campbell, and M. J. L. Duff
Fracture of the Neck of the Femur After Surface Arthroplasty of the Hip
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2004;
86(9):
1874 - 1877.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|