This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) [Supplementary Material] Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ritter, M. A Articles by Berend, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ritter, M. A Articles by Berend, M. Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Simultaneous Bilateral, Staged Bilateral, and Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

A Survival Analysis

Investigation performed at The Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, St. Francis Hospital, Mooresville, Indiana

Merrill A. Ritter, MD
Leesa D. Harty, BA
Kenneth E. Davis, MS
John B. Meding, MD
Michael Berend, MD
The Center for Hip and Knee Surgery, St. Francis Hospital, 1199 Hadley Road, Mooresville, IN 46158

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: The rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality are areas of concern associated with simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement. The purpose of this paper was to compare the rates of morbidity and mortality and the clinical outcome in large groups of consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement, unilateral total knee replacement, or staged bilateral total knee replacement.

Methods: A total of 6200 total knee replacements, performed in 3998 patients between 1983 and 2000, consisted of 2050 simultaneous bilateral, 1796 unilateral, and 152 staged bilateral total knee replacements. A review of each group was conducted to compare the rates of morbidity and mortality, the survival of the prosthesis, and the clinical outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed with failure defined as revision because of aseptic loosening and as patient death. Complications and Knee Society scores were compared throughout the fifteen-year follow-up period (average, 4.3 years of follow-up).

Results: The unilateral group had significantly lower Knee Society scores than the simultaneous bilateral group (p < 0.0001 up to twelve years, and p = 0.0067 at fifteen years) across all postoperative time-intervals. The percentage of patients who had thrombophlebitis was significantly higher in the simultaneous bilateral group (0.9%) than in the unilateral group (0.3%) (p = 0.0326). No significant differences were found with regard to prosthetic failure, cardiac complications, and the rates of death in the three groups. Ten years postoperatively, the simultaneous bilateral group had a significantly higher rate of patient survival than did the unilateral group (78.6% compared with 72.0%) (p = 0.0062).

Conclusions: The significantly higher rate of thrombophlebitis in the simultaneous bilateral group compared with that in the unilateral group may represent a greater risk to those patients. However, we believe that when there are adequate indications for bilateral total knee replacement, simultaneous bilateral arthroplasty is beneficial to patients, with a minimal increase in the risk of death or other complications compared with that associated with unilateral and staged procedures.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Restrepo, J. Parvizi, T. Dietrich, and T. A. Einhorn Safety of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Meta-Analysis J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1220 - 1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Barrett, J. A. Baron, E. Losina, J. Wright, N. N. Mahomed, and J. N. Katz Bilateral Total Knee Replacement: Staging and Pulmonary Embolism J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2006; 88(10): 2146 - 2151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Syed, T. Vanhelder, and D. Wijeysundera 26465 - DOES STAGING BILATERAL KNEE SURGERY DECREASE CARDIAC MORBIDITY? Can J Anesth, June 1, 2006; 53(suppl_1): 26465 - 26465. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. M. Hutchinson, E. N. Parish, and M. J. Cross A comparison of bilateral uncemented total knee arthroplasty: SIMULTANEOUS OR STAGED? J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 40 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schafer, R. Elke, J. R. Young, P. Gancs, and C. H. Kindler Safety of one-stage bilateral hip and knee arthroplasties under regional anaesthesia and routine anaesthetic monitoring J Bone Joint Surg Br, August 1, 2005; 87-B(8): 1134 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. D. Sliva, J. J. Callaghan, D. D. Goetz, and S. G. Taylor Staggered Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Four to Seven Days Apart During a Single Hospitalization J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 508 - 513. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2003 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.