This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
 Pediatrics Test 2: Pediatric Topics of Interest
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JBJS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tudisco, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ippolito, E.
Right arrow Articles by Tudisco, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:1286-1294 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Scientific Article

Long-Term Comparative Results in Patients with Congenital Clubfoot Treated with Two Different Protocols

E. Ippolito, MD, P. Farsetti, MD, R. Caterini, MD and C. Tudisco, MD

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rome, Rome, Italy

E. Ippolito, MD
P. Farsetti, MD
R. Caterini, MD
C. Tudisco, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Rome "Tor Vergata," Via Montpellier, 1-00133 Rome, Italy. E-mail address for E. Ippolito: e.ippolito{at}mclink.it

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the Santa Lucia Foundation for Assistance and Research, which allowed them to perform all of the radiographic and computed tomography studies in its hospital. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Long-term follow-up studies of adults who had been treated for congenital clubfoot as infants are rare. The purpose of this study was to review and compare the long-term results in two groups of patients with congenital clubfoot treated with two different techniques. In both groups, treatment was started within the first three weeks of life by manipulation and application of toe-to-groin plaster casts, with a different technique in each group. At the end of the manipulative treatment, a posteromedial release was performed when the patient was between eight and twelve months of age in the first group and a limited posterior release was performed when the patient was between two and four months of age in the second group.

Methods: At the follow-up evaluations, all patients were interviewed and examined, and standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and computed tomography scans of the foot were made. The results of treatment were graded according to the system of Laaveg and Ponseti. Numerous angular measurements were made on the radiographs, and the measurements in the two groups were compared.

Results: The first group, which included thirty-two patients (forty-seven clubfeet), was followed until an average age of twenty-five years. The second group, with thirty-two patients (forty-nine clubfeet), was followed until an average age of nineteen years. In the first group, there were two excellent, eighteen good, eleven fair, and sixteen poor results. In the second group, there were eighteen excellent, twenty good, six fair, and five poor results. According to the system of Laaveg and Ponseti, the mean rating in the first group was 74.7 points and that in the second group was 85.4 points.

Conclusions: In the second group, use of Ponseti's manipulation technique and cast immobilization followed by an open heel-cord lengthening and a limited posterior ankle release gave much better long-term results than those obtained in the first group, treated with our manipulation technique and cast immobilization followed by an extensive posteromedial release of the foot. In our hands, this operation did not prevent relapse, and neither cavovarus nor forefoot adduction was completely corrected.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related articles in JBJS:

Long-Term Comparative Results in Patients with Congenital Clubfoot Treated with Two Different Protocols • E. Ippolito, P. Farsetti, R. Caterini, and C. Tudisco reply
Kajal B. Mukerjee, Ernesto Ippolito, Pasquale Farsetti, Roberto Caterini, and Cosimo Tudisco
JBJS 2004 86: 1830-1832. [Extract] [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
J. Bridgens and N. Kiely
Current management of clubfoot (congenital talipes equinovarus)
BMJ, February 2, 2010; 340(feb02_1): c355 - c355.
[Full Text]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. A. Halanski, J. E. Davison, J.-C. Huang, C. G. Walker, S. J. Walsh, and H. A. Crawford
Ponseti Method Compared with Surgical Treatment of Clubfoot: A Prospective Comparison
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2010; 92(2): 270 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
D. J. Gerlach, C. A. Gurnett, N. Limpaphayom, F. Alaee, Z. Zhang, K. Porter, M. Kirchhofer, M. D. Smyth, and M. B. Dobbs
Early Results of the Ponseti Method for the Treatment of Clubfoot Associated with Myelomeningocele
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2009; 91(6): 1350 - 1359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. Radler, H. M. Manner, R. Suda, R. Burghardt, J. E. Herzenberg, R. Ganger, and F. Grill
Radiographic Evaluation of Idiopathic Clubfeet Undergoing Ponseti Treatment
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1177 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. B. Dobbs, R. Nunley, and P. L. Schoenecker
Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with Clubfeet Treated with Extensive Soft-Tissue Release
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., May 1, 2006; 88(5): 986 - 996.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. Ippolito, L. Fraracci, P. Farsetti, and F. De Maio
Validity of the Anteroposterior Talocalcaneal Angle to Assess Congenital Clubfoot Correction
Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2004; 182(5): 1279 - 1282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Non Operative Treatment of Club Foot Deformity
Martin Altchek
JBJS Online, 16 Oct 2003 [Full text]
Dr. Ippolito responds to Dr. Altchek
Ernesto Ippolito, et al.
JBJS Online, 17 Nov 2003 [Full text]