The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:820-824 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Foot and Ankle Fractures in Elderly White Women
Incidence and Risk Factors
Carl T. Hasselman, MD,
Molly T. Vogt, PhD,
Katie L. Stone, PhD,
Jane A. Cauley, DrPH and
Stephen F. Conti, MD
Investigation performed at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Carl T. Hasselman, MD
Molly T. Vogt, PhD
Jane A. Cauley, DrPH
Stephen F. Conti, MD
Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (C.T.H., M.T.V., and S.F.C.) and Epidemiology (M.T.V. and J.A.C.), L.S. Kaufmann Building, Suite 911, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. E-mail address for S. Conti: contisf{at}msx.upmc.edu
Katie L. Stone, PhD
Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, 74 New Montgomery Street, Suite 600, San Francisco, CA 94105
In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from the National Institutes of Health. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).
Background: Although foot and ankle fractures are among the most common nonspinal fractures occurring in older women, little is known about their epidemiology. This study was designed to determine the incidence of and risk factors for foot and ankle fractures in a cohort of 9704 elderly, nonblack women enrolled in the multicenter Study of Osteoporotic Fractures.
Methods: At their first clinic visit, between 1986 and 1988, the women provided information regarding lifestyle, subjective health, and function. Bone mineral density was measured in the proximal and distal parts of the radius and in the calcaneus. The women were followed for a mean of 10.2 years, during which time 301 of them had a foot fracture and 291 had an ankle fracture. The fractures were classified with use of a modification of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's guidelines.
Results: The incidence of foot fractures was 3.1 per 1000 woman-years, and the incidence of ankle fractures was 3.0 per 1000 woman-years. The most common ankle fracture was an isolated fibular fracture (prevalence, 57.6%), and the most common foot fracture was a fracture of the fifth metatarsal (56.9%). Women who sustained an ankle fracture had been slightly younger at the time of study enrollment than the women who did not sustain such a fracture (71.0 compared with 71.7 years), they had a higher body mass index (27.6 compared with 26.5), and they were more likely to have fallen within the twelve months prior to filling out the original questionnaire (38.1% compared with 29.7%). The appendicular bone mineral density was not significantly different between these two groups of subjects.
Women who sustained a foot fracture had a lower bone mineral density in the distal part of the radius (0.345 g/cm
2 compared with 0.363 g/cm
2 ) and a lower calcaneal bone mineral density (0.394 g/cm
2 compared with 0.404 g/cm
2 ) than the women without a foot fracture, they were less likely to be physically active (62.3% compared with 67.8%), and they were more likely to have had a previous fracture after the age of fifty (45.5% compared with 36.8%) and to be using either long or short-acting benzodiazepines.
Conclusions: Overall, foot fractures appeared to be typical osteoporotic fractures, whereas ankle fractures occurred in younger women with a relatively high body mass index.
Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level I-1 (prospective study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Kannus, S. Niemi, M. Palvanen, H. Sievanen, J. Parkkari, and M. Jarvinen
Rising Incidence of Low-Trauma Fractures of the Calcaneus and Foot Among Finnish Older Adults
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.,
June 1, 2008;
63(6):
642 - 645.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. LaFleur, C. McAdam-Marx, C. Kirkness, and D. I Brixner
Clinical Risk Factors for Fracture in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women: A Review of the Recent Literature
Ann. Pharmacother.,
March 1, 2008;
42(3):
375 - 386.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L J Donaldson, I P Reckless, S Scholes, J S Mindell, and N J Shelton
The epidemiology of fractures in England
J. Epidemiol. Community Health,
February 1, 2008;
62(2):
174 - 180.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R.W. Westerman and K. Porter
Ankle fractures in adults: an overview
Trauma,
October 1, 2007;
9(4):
267 - 272.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Center, D. Bliuc, T. V. Nguyen, and J. A. Eisman
Risk of Subsequent Fracture After Low-Trauma Fracture in Men and Women
JAMA,
January 24, 2007;
297(4):
387 - 394.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|