The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:815-819 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Patient Compliance in Avoiding Wrong-Site Surgery
Christopher W. DiGiovanni, MD,
Lana Kang, MD and
Jennifer Manuel, MD
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island
Christopher W. DiGiovanni, MD
University Orthopedics, 1287 North Main Street, Providence, RI 02904. E-mail address: yodigi{at}aol.com
Lana Kang, MD
Jennifer Manuel, MD
Department of Orthopaedics, Brown University School of Medicine, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: Wrong-site orthopaedic surgery is an uncommon, devastating, and preventable complication. The sole responsibility for avoiding this inadvertent event has historically been placed on physicians, nurses, and ancillary health-care personnel. Very little attention has been focused on the role of the patient. The successful outcome of any surgical or medical intervention requires an interactive doctor-patient relationship. The hypothesis of this study was that a substantial number of patients who undergo elective orthopaedic surgery do not comply with instructions designed specifically to prevent wrong-site surgery.
Methods: We prospectively evaluated the frequency with which 100 consecutive patients in a private foot-and-ankle practice followed the explicit preoperative instruction, before they underwent elective orthopaedic surgery, to mark "NO" on the extremity that was not to be operated on. Full compliance was defined as a mark on the correct extremity consistent with the instructions. Partial compliance was defined as a mark that was different from that requested by the specific preoperative instructions, and noncompliance was defined as the absence of any mark. Specific demographic and surgical factors were recorded from medical charts and compared between compliant and noncompliant patients.
Results: Fifty-nine of the 100 patients marked the extremity correctly, thirty-seven made no mark, and four were considered partially compliant. Of the ten patients with a Workers' Compensation claim, seven were noncompliant compared with thirty (33%) of the ninety patients who had not made a Workers' Compensation claim (p = 0.023). Patients who had had a previous related surgical procedure also had a significantly higher rate of noncompliance (51%; nineteen of thirty-seven) compared with those with no previous surgery (29%; eighteen of sixty-three; p = 0.023).
Conclusions: A surprisingly high number of patients do not comply with explicit preoperative instructions created specifically to prevent wrong-site surgery. This behavior suggests that patients expect the system to "take care of everything," despite solicitation of their active participation to avoid such adverse events. Although physicians and related health-care personnel certainly have the greatest responsibility to provide the highest possible quality of care, patients undergoing surgery must be encouraged to take a more active role in their health care in order to optimize outcome and minimize risk.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Facebook  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
D. A. Wong, B. Lewis, J. Herndon, C. Martin Jr., and R. Brooks
Patient Safety in North America: Beyond "Operate Through Your Initials" and "Sign Your Site"
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2009;
91(6):
1534 - 1541.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. A. Wong, J. H. Herndon, S. T. Canale, R. L. Brooks, T. R. Hunt, H. R. Epps, S. S. Fountain, S. A. Albanese, and N. A. Johanson
Medical Errors in Orthopaedics. Results of an AAOS Member Survey
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2009;
91(3):
547 - 557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. W. Simon, Y. Ngo, S. Khan, and D. Strogatz
Surgical Confusions in Ophthalmology
Arch Ophthalmol,
November 1, 2007;
125(11):
1515 - 1522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. C. Seiden and P. Barach
Wrong-Side/Wrong-Site, Wrong-Procedure, and Wrong-Patient Adverse Events: Are They Preventable?
Arch Surg,
September 1, 2006;
141(9):
931 - 939.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S G Fraser and W Adams
Wrong site surgery
Br J Ophthalmol,
July 1, 2006;
90(7):
814 - 816.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. C. Quick, K. J. Saleh, W. E. Sime, W. Martin, C. L. Cooper, J. D. Quick, and M. A. Mont
Symposium * Stress Management Skills for Strong Leadership: Is It Worth Dying For?
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
January 1, 2006;
88(1):
217 - 225.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Cronen, V. Ringus, G. Sigle, and J. Ryu
Sterility of Surgical Site Marking
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2005;
87(10):
2193 - 2195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Ellner, A. Hoey, and L. E Frisch
Speak up!
BMJ,
August 9, 2003;
327(7410):
303 - 304.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
Letters to the Editor:
Read all Letters to the Editor
- Will literacy ratio affect the incidence of wrong site surgery?
- Sukhbir Singh Sangwan, et al.
- JBJS Online, 4 Aug 2003
[Full text]
- Re: Will literacy ratio affect the incidence of wrong site surgery?
- Kirti M Marya
- JBJS Online, 14 Aug 2003
[Full text]
|
