This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
Spine Test 1: Trauma
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sechriest, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, K.
Right arrow Articles by Sechriest, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:773-781 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Article

Operative Compared with Nonoperative Treatment of a Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture without Neurological Deficit

A Prospective, Randomized Study

K. Wood, MD, G. Buttermann, MD, A. Mehbod, MD, T. Garvey, MD, R. Jhanjee, MD and V. Sechriest, MD

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and Midwest Spine and Orthopaedics, Stillwater, Minnesota

K. Wood, MD
A. Mehbod, MD
T. Garvey, MD
R. Jhanjee, MD
V. Sechriest, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E., MMC 492, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail address for K. Wood: woodx003{at}tc.umn.edu

G. Butterman, MDMidwest Spine and Orthopaedics, 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard West, Suite 100, Stillwater, MN 55082

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

Background: To our knowledge, a prospective, randomized study comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture in patients without a neurological deficit has never been performed. Our hypothesis was that operative treatment would lead to superior long-term clinical outcomes.

Methods: From 1994 to 1998, forty-seven consecutive patients (thirty-two men and fifteen women) with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and no neurological deficit were randomized to one of two treatment groups: operative (posterior or anterior arthrodesis and instrumentation) or nonoperative treatment (application of a body cast or orthosis). Radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed for sagittal alignment and canal compromise. All patients completed a questionnaire to assess any disability they may have had before the injury, and they indicated the degree of pain at the time of presentation with use of a visual analog scale. The average duration of follow-up was forty-four months (minimum, twenty-four months). After treatment, patients indicated the degree of pain with use of the visual analog scale and they completed the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire, the Oswestry back-pain questionnaire, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey.

Results: In the operative group (twenty-four patients), the average fracture kyphosis was 10.1° at the time of admission and 13° at the final follow-up evaluation. The average canal compromise was 39% on admission, and it improved to 22% at the final follow-up examination. In the nonoperative group (twenty-three patients), the average kyphosis was 11.3° at the time of admission and 13.8° at the final follow-up examination after treatment. The average canal compromise was 34% at the time of admission and improved to 19% at the final follow-up examination. On the basis of the numbers available, no significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to return to work. The average pain scores at the time of the latest follow-up were similar for both groups. The preinjury scores were similar for both groups; however, at the time of the final follow-up, those who were treated nonoperatively reported less disability. Final scores on the SF-36 and Oswestry questionnaires were similar for the two groups, although certain trends favored those treated without surgery. Complications were more frequent in the operative group.

Conclusion: We found that operative treatment of patients with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and normal findings on the neurological examination provided no major long-term advantage compared with nonoperative treatment.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level II-2 (poor-quality randomized controlled trial [e.g., <80% follow-up]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. A. Patel and A. R. Vaccaro
Thoracolumbar Spine Trauma Classification
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2010; 18(2): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. J. Lenarz, C. M. Wittgen, and H. M. Place
Management of a Pregnant Patient with a Burst Fracture Causing Neurologic Injury. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2009; 91(7): 1747 - 1749.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
R. A.W. Marco and V. P. Kushwaha
Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Treated with Posterior Decompression and Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Supplemented with Balloon-Assisted Vertebroplasty and Calcium Phosphate Reconstruction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2009; 91(1): 20 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
P. G. Whang and A. R. Vaccaro
Thoracolumbar Fracture: Posterior Instrumentation Using Distraction and Ligamentotaxis Reduction
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2007; 15(11): 695 - 701.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
M. R. Mikles, R. P. Stchur, and G. P. Graziano
Posterior Instrumentation for Thoracolumbar Fractures
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2004; 12(6): 424 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Operative vs. Non Operative Treatment of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures
D.K. Sengupta, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 4 May 2004 [Full text]