This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the activity for this article: Spine Test 1: Trauma [Supplementary Material] An erratum has been published Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Letters to the Editor: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wood, K. Articles by Sechriest, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wood, K. Articles by Sechriest, V. Social Bookmarking             What's this?

Operative Compared with Nonoperative Treatment of a Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture without Neurological Deficit

A Prospective, Randomized Study

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, and Midwest Spine and Orthopaedics, Stillwater, Minnesota

K. Wood, MD
A. Mehbod, MD
T. Garvey, MD
R. Jhanjee, MD
V. Sechriest, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street S.E., MMC 492, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail address for K. Wood: woodx003{at}tc.umn.edu

G. Butterman, MDMidwest Spine and Orthopaedics, 1950 Curve Crest Boulevard West, Suite 100, Stillwater, MN 55082

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

Background: To our knowledge, a prospective, randomized study comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture in patients without a neurological deficit has never been performed. Our hypothesis was that operative treatment would lead to superior long-term clinical outcomes.

Methods: From 1994 to 1998, forty-seven consecutive patients (thirty-two men and fifteen women) with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and no neurological deficit were randomized to one of two treatment groups: operative (posterior or anterior arthrodesis and instrumentation) or nonoperative treatment (application of a body cast or orthosis). Radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed for sagittal alignment and canal compromise. All patients completed a questionnaire to assess any disability they may have had before the injury, and they indicated the degree of pain at the time of presentation with use of a visual analog scale. The average duration of follow-up was forty-four months (minimum, twenty-four months). After treatment, patients indicated the degree of pain with use of the visual analog scale and they completed the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire, the Oswestry back-pain questionnaire, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey.

Results: In the operative group (twenty-four patients), the average fracture kyphosis was 10.1° at the time of admission and 13° at the final follow-up evaluation. The average canal compromise was 39% on admission, and it improved to 22% at the final follow-up examination. In the nonoperative group (twenty-three patients), the average kyphosis was 11.3° at the time of admission and 13.8° at the final follow-up examination after treatment. The average canal compromise was 34% at the time of admission and improved to 19% at the final follow-up examination. On the basis of the numbers available, no significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to return to work. The average pain scores at the time of the latest follow-up were similar for both groups. The preinjury scores were similar for both groups; however, at the time of the final follow-up, those who were treated nonoperatively reported less disability. Final scores on the SF-36 and Oswestry questionnaires were similar for the two groups, although certain trends favored those treated without surgery. Complications were more frequent in the operative group.

Conclusion: We found that operative treatment of patients with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and normal findings on the neurological examination provided no major long-term advantage compared with nonoperative treatment.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level II-2 (poor-quality randomized controlled trial [e.g., <80% follow-up]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

CiteULike

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Technorati

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Lenarz, C. M. Wittgen, and H. M. Place Management of a Pregnant Patient with a Burst Fracture Causing Neurologic Injury. A Case Report J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2009; 91(7): 1747 - 1749. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A.W. Marco and V. P. Kushwaha Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Treated with Posterior Decompression and Pedicle Screw Instrumentation Supplemented with Balloon-Assisted Vertebroplasty and Calcium Phosphate Reconstruction J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2009; 91(1): 20 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. G. Whang and A. R. Vaccaro Thoracolumbar Fracture: Posterior Instrumentation Using Distraction and Ligamentotaxis Reduction J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2007; 15(11): 695 - 701. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. R. Mikles, R. P. Stchur, and G. P. Graziano Posterior Instrumentation for Thoracolumbar Fractures J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., November 1, 2004; 12(6): 424 - 435. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2003 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.