This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
Adult Knee Reconstruction Test 2: Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rand, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harmsen, W. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rand, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harmsen, W. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:259-265 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Article

Factors Affecting the Durability of Primary Total Knee Prostheses

James A. Rand, MD, Robert T. Trousdale, MD, Duane M. Ilstrup, MS and W. Scott Harmsen, MS

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

James A. Rand, MD
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, 13400 East Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259. E-mail address: rand.james{at}mayo.edu

Robert T. Trousdale, MD
Duane M. Ilstrup, MS
W. Scott Harmsen, MS
Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota 55905

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. One or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (royalties from Smith and Nephew). In addition, a commercial entity (Smith and Nephew) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Failure of total knee arthroplasty is problematic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the factors that influence the durability of a primary total knee prosthesis.

Methods: A survivorship analysis of 11,606 primary total knee arthroplasties carried out between January 1, 1978, and December 31, 2000, was performed. An analysis of patient and implant-related factors affecting survivorship was done with use of a multivariate Cox model.

Results: The survivorship was 91% (95% confidence interval, 90% to 91%) at ten years (2943 knees), 84% (95% confidence interval, 82% to 86%) at fifteen years (595 knees), and 78% (95% confidence interval, 74% to 81%) at twenty years (104 knees) following the surgery. Prosthetic survivorship at ten years was 83% for patients fifty-five years of age or less compared with 94% for those older than seventy years of age (p < 0.0001), 90% for those with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis compared with 95% for those with inflammatory arthritis (p < 0.005), and 91% for those with retention of the posterior cruciate ligament compared with 76% for those with substitution of the posterior cruciate ligament (a posterior stabilized prosthesis) (p < 0.0001). Survivorship at ten years was 92% for nonmodular metal-backed tibial components, 90% for modular metal-backed tibial components, and 97% for all-polyethylene tibial components (p < 0.0001). Survivorship at ten years was 92% for prostheses fixed with cement compared with 61% for those fixed without cement (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Significant risk factors for failure of total knee arthroplasty were the type of implant, age and gender of the patient, diagnosis, type of fixation, and design of the patellar component. In the ideal situation—treatment of a woman over the age of seventy years who has inflammatory arthritis with a nonmodular, metal-backed tibial component, cement fixation, an all-polyethylene patellar component, and retention of the posterior cruciate ligament—the ten-year survivorship of the prosthesis was estimated to be 98% (95% confidence interval, 97% to 99%).

Level of Evidence: Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
G. R. Scuderi, R. M. Meneghini, R. E. Booth Jr., M. A. Mont, M. S. McGrath, and M. G. Zywiel
Technologic Developments in Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2009; 91(Supplement_5): 49 - 51.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. A. Bettinson, I. M. Pinder, C. G. Moran, D. J. Weir, and E. A. Lingard
All-Polyethylene Compared with Metal-Backed Tibial Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty at Ten Years. A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2009; 91(7): 1587 - 1594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. Jamsen, H. Huhtala, T. Puolakka, and T. Moilanen
Risk Factors for Infection After Knee Arthroplasty. A Register-Based Analysis of 43,149 Cases
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2009; 91(1): 38 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Ogino, H. Kawaji, L. Konttinen, M. Lehto, P. Rantanen, A. Malmivaara, Y. T. Konttinen, and J. Salo
Total Hip Replacement in Patients Eighty Years of Age and Older
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2008; 90(9): 1884 - 1890.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
D. D.R. Naudie, D. J. Ammeen, G. A. Engh, and C. H. Rorabeck
Wear and Osteolysis Around Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., January 1, 2007; 15(1): 53 - 64.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
P.-Y. Sheng, L. Konttinen, M. Lehto, D. Ogino, E. Jamsen, J. Nevalainen, J. Pajamaki, P. Halonen, and Y. T. Konttinen
Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: 1990 Through 2002. A Review of the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2006; 88(7): 1425 - 1430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
G. Lewis and A. Bhattaram
Influence of a Pre-blended Antibiotic (Gentamicin Sulfate Powder) on Various Mechanical, Thermal, and Physical Properties of Three Acrylic Bone Cements
J Biomater Appl, April 1, 2006; 20(4): 377 - 408.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. Arora and A. C. Ogden
Osteolysis in a surface-cemented, primary, modular Freeman-Samuelson total knee replacement
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2005; 87-B(11): 1502 - 1506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. C. Dixon, R. R. Brown, D. Parsch, and R. D. Scott
Modular Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty with Retention of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament. A Study of Patients Followed for a Minimum of Fifteen Years
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2005; 87(3): 598 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. N. Katz, J. Barrett, N. N. Mahomed, J. A. Baron, R. J. Wright, and E. Losina
Association Between Hospital and Surgeon Procedure Volume and the Outcomes of Total Knee Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2004; 86(9): 1909 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
M. J. Archibeck and R. E. White Jr.
What's New in Adult Reconstructive Knee Surgery
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2004; 86(8): 1839 - 1849.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
A. A. Spirt, M. Assal, and S. T. Hansen Jr.
Complications and Failure After Total Ankle Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1172 - 1178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]