This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exams for this article:
 CME 4: October, November, December 2003
Hand Test 3: Topics of Interest
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGinley, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kozin, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McGinley, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Kozin, S. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:2403-2409 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Forearm and Elbow Injury: The Influence of Rotational Position

Joseph C. McGinley, MS1, Brendon C. Hopgood, MD2, John P. Gaughan, PhD1, Keyanoush Sadeghipour, PhD1 and Scott H. Kozin, MD3

1 School of Medicine (J.C.McG.), Department of Biostatistics (J.P.G.), and College of Engineering (K.S.), Temple University, 3400 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140
2 Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein Medical Center, 5501 Old York Road, Philadelphia, PA 19141
3 Shriners Hospital for Children, Pediatric Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery, 3551 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140. E-mail address: skozin{at}shrinenet.org

Investigation performed at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop an axial loading forearm fracture model and to determine the influence of forearm rotation on the fracture pattern.

Methods: Twenty-six cadaveric arms were thawed in saline solution. Pressure-sensitive film was sealed and was placed through a lateral arthrotomy into the radiocapitellar joint. The arm was potted at the proximal part of the humerus with the elbow in extension. Rotational range of motion was measured with use of a goniometer starting from a supinated position (0°). Specimens were placed in a vertical position at various angles of forearm rotation, and a 27-kg mass was raised to 90 cm and was dropped onto the distal part of the radius. The pressure film was removed and was analyzed to determine the radiocapitellar joint contact area following impact. Each arm was dissected, and the injury pattern was assessed.

Results: Both-bone forearm fractures (proximal radial fractures with concomitant distal ulnar fractures) occurred at 5° ± 2.6° of rotation, isolated radial head fractures occurred at 44.4° ± 5.2° of rotation, and Essex-Lopresti fractures (radial head fractures with tearing of the interosseous membrane) occurred at 70° ± 25.2° of rotation. The distribution of Essex-Lopresti and radial head fractures was significantly different at a cutpoint of 54° of forearm rotation (p = 0.009), and the distribution of radial head fractures and both-bone forearm fractures was significantly different at a cutpoint of 10° of forearm rotation (p = 0.001). The percent contact area of the radial head varied with the injury pattern (p = 0.029). Marginal radial head fractures occurred at 46.7° ± 6.6° of rotation with a contact area of 30.9% ± 8.6%, while comminuted radial head fractures occurred at 74.4° ± 27.2° of rotation with a contact area of 53.9% ± 8.3%.

Conclusion: The amount of forearm rotation at the time of axial load impact directly influenced the injury pattern. Furthermore, the radial head contact area and the fracture severity increased in pronation compared with supination.

Clinical Relevance: This model provides the basis for investigating the mechanisms involved in forearm and elbow trauma under the application of an axial impact load. Using this model, we established the relationship between rotation and the fracture pattern incurred by the forearm and radial head.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?