This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activities for this article:
 CME 4: October, November, December 2003
Adult Hip Reconstruction Test 2: Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaulé, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beaulé, P. E.
Right arrow Articles by Amstutz, H. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:2288-2293 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Fate of Cementless Acetabular Components Retained During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Paul E. Beaulé, MD, FRCSC1, Michel J. LeDuff, MA1, Frederick J. Dorey, PhD1 and Harlan C. Amstutz, MD1

1 Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90007. E-mail address for P.E. Beaulé: pbeaule{at}laoh.ucla.edu

Investigation performed at Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California

In support of their research or preparation of this work, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Los Angeles Orthopaedic Hospital Foundation. None of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Removal of a well-fixed cementless acetabular component can result in increased operative time and postoperative morbidity. The objectives of this retrospective study were to determine whether retention of a well-fixed acetabular component at the time of isolated femoral revision was compatible with long-term socket survival.

Methods: The records of eighty-three consecutive patients (ninety hips) in whom a well-fixed cementless socket had been retained during revision of a femoral component were reviewed. The mean age of the patients was 48.7 years at the time of the primary arthroplasty and 54.1 years at the time of femoral revision. The radiographic analysis was based on anteroposterior radiographs and was performed by a single independent reviewer. The intraoperative criterion for stability of the socket was the absence of movement at the bone-implant interface during the application of direct pressure to the edges of the socket in four quadrants with use of a metallic pusher.

Results: At the time of the isolated femoral revision, no socket demonstrated a radiolucent line measuring >1 mm in any two zones and forty of the ninety hips had periacetabular osteolysis. The mean size of the osteolytic lesions was 5.71 cm2 (range, 0.4 to 24.2 cm2), and twenty-eight of the forty hips underwent bone-grafting. The mean duration of follow-up was 9.7 years after the isolated femoral revision and 14.9 years after the primary arthroplasty. Five acetabular sockets were revised at a mean of 6.8 years after the femoral revision. Only one of these sockets had failed because of aseptic loosening. With revision of the acetabular component for any reason as the end point, the survival rate was 98.7% at five years and 93.5% at ten years after the femoral revision and 100% at ten years and 93.9% at fifteen years after the primary arthroplasty. No hip showed recurrence or expansion of periacetabular osteolysis. The prevalence of dislocation was 16% (fourteen of ninety).

Conclusions: Revision of a stable, cementless acetabular component solely on the basis of its duration in vivo or the presence of periacetabular osteolysis does not appear to be warranted. Retention of the socket with grafting of larger periacetabular osteolytic lesions appears to be consistent with satisfactory socket longevity.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
M. Pekmezci, J. Keeney, A. Schutz, and J. C. Clohisy
Retention of a Well-Fixed Acetabular Component in the Setting of Massive Acetabular Osteolysis and Pelvic Discontinuity. A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2009; 91(9): 2232 - 2237.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
A. V. Lombardi Jr and K. R. Berend
Isolated Acetabular Liner Exchange
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2008; 16(5): 243 - 246.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
A. Shimmin, P. E. Beaule, and P. Campbell
Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 637 - 654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
C. J. D. Valle, T. Shuaipaj, R. A. Berger, A. G. Rosenberg, S. Shott, J. J. Jacobs, and J. O. Galante
Revision of the Acetabular Component without Cement After Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Concise Follow-up, at Fifteen to Nineteen Years, of a Previous Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2005; 87(8): 1795 - 1800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]