The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:2138-2144 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
The Effect of Variation in Definition on the Diagnosis of Multidirectional Instability of the Shoulder
Edward G. McFarland, MD1,
Tae Kyun Kim, MD, PHD2,
Hyung Bin Park, MD1,
Carlos A. Neira, MD3 and
Maria Isabel Gutierrez, MD, MSC4
1 Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic
Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University, 10753 Falls Road, Suite 215,
Lutherville, MD 21093. E-mail address for E.G. McFarland:
emcfarl{at}jhmi.edu
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,
Seongnam, Kyungki-do, Korea
3 Orthopaedic Service, Hospital San Juan de Dios, Cali, Columbia
4 Department of Mental Hygiene, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns
Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205
Investigation performed at The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore,
Maryland
The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their
research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or
other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a
commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or
direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational
institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the
authors are affiliated or associated.
Background: There currently is a wide variation in the definition of
multidirectional instability of the shoulder in the literature. The purpose of
this study was to determine if these variations influence the distribution of
the diagnoses in a cohort of patients with shoulder instability.
Methods: A cohort of 168 patients who underwent shoulder surgery for
instability of any type was studied. Statistical analysis was performed in two
steps. First, the instability of the shoulder in each patient was classified
with the use of four existing systems, and the number of patients classified
as having multidirectional instability was compared among the classification
systems. Second, the definition of multidirectional instability was modified
so that the result of laxity testing was the criterion for making the
diagnosis, and the changes in the distribution of patients with a diagnosis of
multidirectional instability were analyzed.
Results: Classification with the four existing systems resulted in
significant differences in the number of patients diagnosed as having
multidirectional instability, with two (1.2%), seven (4.2%), thirteen (7.7%),
and fourteen patients (8.3%) so diagnosed (p < 0.05). Modification of the
definition of multidirectional instability so that it was based on laxity
testing resulted in a wide variation in the number of patients diagnosed as
having multidirectional instability; these numbers ranged from fourteen (8.3%)
to 139 (82.7%) (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that variations in the criteria
used for the diagnosis of multidirectional instability significantly affect
the distribution of patients with that diagnosis. The use of laxity testing
tends to result in an overestimation of the number of patients with this
condition. This observation is important because the results of studies may
vary if patients with traumatic instability are considered to have
multidirectional instability on the basis of laxity testing. Investigators
studying patients with multidirectional instability should carefully define
the inclusion criteria that they used.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Bahk, E. Keyurapan, A. Tasaki, E. L. Sauers, and E. G. McFarland
Laxity Testing of the Shoulder: A Review
Am. J. Sports Med.,
January 1, 2007;
35(1):
131 - 144.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Boileau, M. Villalba, J.-Y. Hery, F. Balg, P. Ahrens, and L. Neyton
Risk Factors for Recurrence of Shoulder Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
August 1, 2006;
88(8):
1755 - 1763.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Farber, R. Castillo, M. Clough, M. Bahk, and E. G. McFarland
Clinical Assessment of Three Common Tests for Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2006;
88(7):
1467 - 1474.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. B. Park, A. Yokota, H. S. Gill, G. El Rassi, and E. G. McFarland
Revision Surgery for Failed Thermal Capsulorrhaphy
Am. J. Sports Med.,
September 1, 2005;
33(9):
1321 - 1326.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. B. Park, A. Yokota, H. S. Gill, G. El Rassi, and E. G. McFarland
Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Tests for the Different Degrees of Subacromial Impingement Syndrome
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
July 1, 2005;
87(7):
1446 - 1455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. C. Montgomery and M. D. Miller
What's New in Sports Medicine
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2005;
87(3):
686 - 694.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Richards
Commentary. The Diagnostic Definition of Multidirectional Instability of the Shoulder: Searching for Direction
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
November 1, 2003;
85(11):
2145 - 2146.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|