This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the activity for this article:
CME 4: October, November, December 2003
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shirreffs, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bullock, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Shirreffs, T. G., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:1981-1986 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Article

Comparison of Simultaneous Bilateral with Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty in Terms of Perioperative Complications

Daniel P. Bullock, BA, Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS and Thomas G. Shirreffs, Jr., MD

Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire

Daniel P. Bullock, BA
Scott M. Sporer, MD, MS
Thomas G. Shirreffs Jr., MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our quarterly CD-ROM (call our subscription department, at 781-449-9780, to order the CD-ROM).

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated an increased rate of perioperative complications and morbidity following simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty compared with the rate following unilateral total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of perioperative complications and morbidity associated with simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with that associated with unilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Methods: The records on all bilateral total knee arthroplasties performed between January 1994 and June 2000 and unilateral total knee arthroplasties performed between January 1995 and June 2000 were retrospectively reviewed. The records on 514 unilateral total knee arthroplasties and 255 bilateral total knee arthroplasties were analyzed to determine demographic information, preoperative comorbidities, perioperative complications, and thirty-day and one-year mortality rates.

Results: The rates of some perioperative complications, including myocardial infarction, postoperative confusion, and the need for intensive monitoring, were greater after the bilateral arthroplasties. However, the thirty-day and one-year mortality rates and the risks of pulmonary embolism, infection, and deep venous thrombosis were similar for the two groups.

Conclusions: The risk of perioperative complications associated with bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty was slightly increased compared with that associated with unilateral total knee arthroplasty, but the mortality rates were similar. Ultimately, the decision to proceed with simultaneous knee replacement should depend on patient preference through informed choice.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Foot Ankle SpecHome page
R. Fridman, J. D. Cain, L. Weil Jr, L. S. Weil Sr, and T. B. Ray
Unilateral Versus Bilateral First Ray Surgery: A Prospective Study of 186 Consecutive Cases-Patient Satisfaction, Cost to Society, and Complications
Foot & Ankle Specialist, June 1, 2009; 2(3): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. Restrepo, J. Parvizi, T. Dietrich, and T. A. Einhorn
Safety of Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty. A Meta-Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1220 - 1226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. Barrett, J. A. Baron, E. Losina, J. Wright, N. N. Mahomed, and J. N. Katz
Bilateral Total Knee Replacement: Staging and Pulmonary Embolism
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2006; 88(10): 2146 - 2151.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. R. M. Hutchinson, E. N. Parish, and M. J. Cross
A comparison of bilateral uncemented total knee arthroplasty: SIMULTANEOUS OR STAGED?
J Bone Joint Surg Br, January 1, 2006; 88-B(1): 40 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Read all Letters to the Editor

Comparison Between Bilateral and Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty
Hari P. Bezwada, M.D., et al.
JBJS Online, 29 Dec 2003 [Full text]
Dr. Bullock responds
Daniel P. Bullock, et al.
JBJS Online, 29 Dec 2003 [Full text]