This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the exam for this article:
 Adult Knee Reconstruction Test 1: Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lonner, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lotke, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lonner, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Lotke, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:56-59 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.

Scientific Article

Fate of the Unrevised All-Polyethylene Patellar Component in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Jess H. Lonner, MD, Michael A. Mont, MD, Peter F. Sharkey, MD, John M. Siliski, MD, Amar D. Rajadhyaksha, MD and Paul A. Lotke, MD

Investigation performed at Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland;Thomas Jefferson Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

Jess H. Lonner, MD
Booth, Bartolozzi, Balderston Orthopaedics, Pennsylvania Hospital, 800 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107

Michael A. Mont, MD
Amar D. Rajadhyaksha, MD
Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, 2401 West Belvedere Avenue, Baltimore, MD 21215

Peter F. Sharkey, MD
Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, 925 Chestnut Street, 5th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19107

John M. Siliski, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital, 1 Hawthorne Place, £105, Boston, MA 02114

Paul A. Lotke, MD
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 2 Silverstein Pavilion, Philadelphia, PA 19104

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (Johnson and Johnson/DePuy, Johnson and Johnson, Osteonics, and Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics). Also, a commercial entity (Johnson and Johnson, Osteonics, and Stryker-Howmedica-Osteonics) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: During revision total knee arthroplasty, the alternatives for addressing the well-positioned and secure all-polyethylene patellar component with minimal or no wear include retention, revision, and resection. The purpose of the present study was to determine the intermediate-term fate of all-polyethylene patellar components that were left in situ at the time of revision tibiofemoral arthroplasty.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the results of 202 revision total knee arthroplasties, performed at four centers, in which a well-fixed, well-positioned all-polyethylene patellar component with minimal wear was retained. Clinical evaluation was performed to identify the presence of anterior knee symptoms or patellar failures, and the Knee Society clinical scores were recorded.

Results: Sixty-eight percent of the revision tibiofemoral components were from a different manufacturer than the retained patellar component. Twenty-one patients (twenty-one knees; 10%) reported anterior knee pain at a mean duration of follow-up of seven years (range, two to fourteen years). Eleven of the twenty-one knees with anterior knee pain had evidence of component loosening, excessive wear, or delamination either on follow-up radiographs or on direct inspection at the time of reoperation. In the other ten knees, the findings were attributable to osseous impingement on the femoral component or soft-tissue dysfunction (including soft-tissue impingement, subluxation, and scarring). Seventeen of the twenty-one patients with anterior knee pain underwent additional surgery to address the source of the pain. Failures due to loosening or wear occurred only in patients in whom the patellar component had been sterilized with gamma irradiation in air; these failures occurred at a mean 7.3 years after revision (eleven years after primary total knee arthroplasty). The likelihood of patellar component failure was significantly greater when the component had been gamma irradiated in air than when it had been sterilized with another method (p = 0.0008). The average knee score increased from 42 to 86 points, and the average function score increased from 46 to 70 points.

Conclusions: Retaining a well-positioned, stable all-polyethylene patellar component at the time of revision tibiofemoral arthroplasty can be successful, provided that the polyethylene has not oxidized. Manufacturing mismatch is acceptable with most contemporary designs provided that the patellar component articulates appropriately with the femoral implant.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series [no, or historical, control group]). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JBJSHome page
N. P. Sheth, D. I. Pedowitz, and J. H. Lonner
Periprosthetic Patellar Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2007; 89(10): 2285 - 2296.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
A. Malik, A. Maheshwari, and L. D. Dorr
Impingement with Total Hip Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2007; 89(8): 1832 - 1842.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
J. H. Lonner, J. G. Jasko, and R. E. Booth Jr.
Revision of a Failed Patellofemoral Arthroplasty to a Total Knee Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2337 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]