This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Supplementary Material]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sprague, S.
Right arrow Articles by Guyatt, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sprague, S.
Right arrow Articles by Guyatt, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 85:158-163 (2003)
© 2003 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


The Orthopaedic Forum

Barriers to Full-Text Publication Following Presentation of Abstracts at Annual Orthopaedic Meetings

Sheila Sprague, BSc, Mohit Bhandari, MD, MSc, P. J. Devereaux, MD, Marc F. Swiontkowski, MD, Paul Tornetta, III, MD, Deborah J. Cook, MD, MSc, Douglas Dirschl, MD, Emil H. Schemitsch, MD and Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc

Sheila Sprague, BSc
Mohit Bhandari, MD, MSc
P.J. Devereaux, MD
Paul Tornetta III, MD
Deborah J. Cook, MD, MSc
Gordon H. Guyatt, MD, MSc
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University Health Sciences Centre, Room 2C12, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. E-mail address for M. Bhandari: bhandari{at}sympatico.ca

Marc F. Swiontkowski, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Box 492, Minneapolis, MN 55455

Douglas Dirschl, MD
Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239
Emil H. Schemitsch, MD
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, 55 Queen Street East, Suite 800, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5C 1R6, Canada

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

Background: Oral presentations at national and international meetings offer an excellent forum for the dissemination of current research findings. However, publication rates of full-text articles after presentation of abstracts at international meetings have ranged from 11% to 78%, which suggests that at least 32% of the abstracts presented are never published as complete articles in peer-reviewed journals. In an effort to identify the reasons that surgeons had not had a paper published following presentation of their work at an international orthopaedic meeting, we conducted a survey of a cross section of authors of orthopaedic papers presented at a national meeting.

Methods: We retrieved all abstracts from the 1996 scientific program of the sixty-third Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. A computerized Medline and PubMed search established whether the abstract had been subsequently published as a full-text article. The authors of the abstracts that had not been subsequently published were surveyed to identify the reasons for the failure to publish.

Results: A total of 465 abstracts were presented at the sixty-third Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons in 1996. We surveyed the authors of 306 abstracts for which we were unable to locate a subsequent full-text publication on Medline. One hundred and ninety-nine investigators (65%) responded to the questionnaire. At the time of the survey, seventy-two manuscripts had been published, thirty-two had been submitted and rejected, fourteen were under consideration by journals, seven had been accepted for publication or were in press, and three were not recalled by the investigator. In addition, seventy-one abstracts (35.7%) of the 199 had not been submitted for publication. The authors of those abstracts were asked to indicate one or more reasons why they had not submitted a manuscript for publication. Thirty-three investigators (46.5%) indicated that they lacked sufficient time for research activities, twenty-two (31.0%) reported that the study presented at the meeting in 1996 was still in progress, fourteen (19.7%) believed that the responsibility for writing the manuscript belonged to someone else, and twelve (16.9%) reported that difficulties with co-authors who would not participate had impeded the completion of the manuscript. Nine investigators (12.7%) responded that the pursuit of publication was a low priority.

Conclusions: In a survey of investigators who had not had a full-text article published after presenting the abstract at a national meeting, we found that the failure to publish was due to one of three main reasons: (1) they did not have enough time to prepare a manuscript for publication (the reason most frequently given); (2) almost one-third of the studies that had not been submitted for publication were ongoing; and (3) relationships with co-authors sometimes presented a barrier to final publication. Thorough preparation before the study and the establishment of stricter guidelines to limit the presentation of preliminary data at national and international meetings may improve publication rates.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
E. Langdon-Neuner
When Does Previous Disclosure Become a 'Prior Publication' Problem?
Chest, January 1, 2009; 135(1): 233 - 237.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
D. Greenberg, O. Wacht, and J. S. Pliskin
Peer Review in Publication: Factors Associated with the Full-Length Publication of Studies Presented in Abstract Form at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making
Med Decis Making, November 1, 2008; 28(6): 938 - 942.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. Reider
Published...or Perished?
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2008; 36(10): 1873 - 1874.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. P. Kleweno, W. K. Bryant, A. M. Jacir, W. N. Levine, and C. S. Ahmad
Discrepancies and Rates of Publication in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Abstracts
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2008; 36(10): 1875 - 1879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. Okike, M. S. Kocher, C. T. Mehlman, J. D. Heckman, and M. Bhandari
Publication Bias in Orthopaedic Research: An Analysis of Scientific Factors Associated with Publication in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume)
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2008; 90(3): 595 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A. Miguel-Dasit, L. Marti-Bonmati, R. Aleixandre, P. Sanfeliu, and D. Bautista
Publication of Material Presented at Radiologic Meetings: Authors' Country and International Collaboration
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 521 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
L. Arrive, P.-Y. Boelle, P. Dono, M. Lewin, L. Monnier-Cholley, and J.-M. Tubiana
Subsequent Publication of Orally Presented Original Studies within 5 Years after 1995 RSNA Scientific Assembly
Radiology, July 1, 2004; 232(1): 101 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]