This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) [Supplementary Material] Letters to the Editor: Submit a response Letters to the Editor: View responses Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services E-mail this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to My File Cabinet Download to citation manager Rights and Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rubel, I.án F. Articles by Helfet, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rubel, I.án F. Articles by Helfet, D. L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Humeral Nonunions

A Biomechanical and Clinical Study

Investigation performed at The Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Iván F. Rubel, MD
Peter Kloen, MD, PhD
Deirdre Campbell, MEng
Mark Schwartz, MD
Alan Liew, MD
Elizabeth Myers, PhD
David L. Helfet, MD
Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (I.F.R., P.K., A.L., and D.L.H.) and Biomechanics and Biomaterials (D.C., M.S., and E.M.), The Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 71st Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address for D.L. Helfet: helfetd{at}hss.edu

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

A video supplement to this article is available from the Video Journal of Orthopaedics. A video clip is available at the JBJS web site, www.jbjs.org. The Video Journal of Orthopaedics can be contacted at (805) 962-3410, web site: www.vjortho.com.

Background: Several studies have compared different methods for fixation of the midpart of the humeral shaft, but there are only scattered data regarding which type of plate construct provides the best fixation for humeral nonunion. The objectives of this study were (1) to obtain objective data on the performance of four different plate constructs used for fixation of humeral nonunion, and (2) to report our clinical experience with plate fixation of thirty-seven nonunions of the midpart of the humeral shaft.

Methods: In the first part of the study, four plate constructs were compared in a Sawbones model. The groups consisted of (1) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate alone; (2) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate and an interfragmentary screw; (3) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate, a lateral 3.5-mm reconstruction plate, and an interfragmentary screw; and (4) a posterior limited-contact dynamic compression plate and a lateral 3.5-mm reconstruction plate. Tests were performed with use of an MTS Bionix machine in anterior-posterior four-point bending, medial-lateral four-point bending, and external rotation torque.

In the second part of the study, the charts of thirty-seven consecutive patients in whom a nonunion of the midpart of the humeral shaft had been treated with plate fixation were reviewed retrospectively. The average age of the patients was forty-eight years (range, thirteen to seventy-eight years). Nineteen patients were treated with a single posterior plate, and eighteen were treated with a two-plate construct with the plates parallel and lying at 90° to each other. All of the nonunions were treated with bone-grafting, and an interfragmentary screw was used in thirty-six of the thirty-seven patients. Radiographs and the clinical status were evaluated at an average of thirteen months postoperatively.

Results: The biomechanical testing showed that the two-plate constructs were significantly stiffer than the single-plate constructs in all test modes (p < 0.05). In the clinical part of the study, thirty-four (92%) of the nonunions healed without complications at an average of 4.8 months. Two nonunions treated with the two-plate construct and one treated with one plate failed to heal.

Conclusions: No significant difference in the healing rate was found between the two clinical groups (p = 0.4, ß = 0.9), and the overall healing rate was 92%. However, a two-plate construct with the plates at right angles is mechanically stiffer than a single-plate construct, which might be helpful if rigid stabilization of the humerus at the midshaft level is needed.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Facebook    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. A. Willis, K. Kutsumi, M. E. Zobitz, and W. P. Cooney III Internal Fixation of Dorsally Displaced Fractures of the Distal Part of the Radius. A Biomechanical Analysis of Volar Plate Fracture Stability J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., November 1, 2006; 88(11): 2411 - 2417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Hierholzer, D. Sama, J. B. Toro, M. Peterson, and D. L. Helfet Plate Fixation of Ununited Humeral Shaft Fractures: Effect of Type of Bone Graft on Healing J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2006; 88(7): 1442 - 1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Letters to the Editor:

Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press (TM) assists in the publication of JBJS Online.
Copyright © 2002 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Online ISSN: 1535-1386.
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery®, JBJS®, JB&JS®, and eJBJS® are registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.