This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow [Video Supplement from the Video Journal of Orthopaedics]
Right arrow Letters to the Editor: Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Letters to the Editor are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Rights and Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lazarus, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lazarus, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Matsen, F. A., III
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:1174-1182 (2002)
© 2002 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.


Scientific Article

The Radiographic Evaluation of Keeled and Pegged Glenoid Component Insertion

Mark D. Lazarus, MD, Kirk L. Jensen, MD, Carleton Southworth, MS and Frederick A. Matsen, III, MD

Background: Radiolucent lines about the glenoid component of a total shoulder replacement are a common finding, even on initial postoperative radiographs. The achievement of complete osseous support of the component has been shown to decrease micromotion. We evaluated the ability of a group of experienced shoulder surgeons to achieve complete cementing and support in a series of patients managed with keeled and pegged glenoid components.

Methods: We reviewed the initial postoperative radiographs of 493 patients with primary osteoarthritis who had been managed with total shoulder arthroplasty by seventeen different surgeons. One hundred and sixty-five patients were excluded because of inadequate radiographs, leaving 328 patients available for review. Of these, thirty-nine patients had a keeled component and 289 had a pegged component. The method of Franklin was used to grade the degree of radiolucency around the keeled components, and a modification of that method was used to grade the degree of radiolucency around the pegged components. The efficacy of component seating on host subchondral bone was evaluated with a newly constructed five-grade scale based on the percentage of the component that was supported by subchondral bone. Each radiograph was graded four times, by two separate reviewers on two separate occasions.

Results: Radiolucencies were extremely common, with only twenty of the 328 glenoids demonstrating no radiolucencies. On a numeric scale (with 0 indicating no radiolucency and 5 indicating gross loosening), the mean radiolucency score was 1.8 ± 0.9 for keeled components and 1.3 ± 0.9 for pegged components (p = 0.0004). After defining categories of "better" and "worse" cementing, we found that pegged components more commonly had "better cementing" than did keeled components (p = 0.0028). Incomplete seating was also common, particularly among patients with keeled components. Ninety-five of the 121 pegged components that had been inserted by the most experienced surgeon had "better cementing," compared with eighty-five of the 168 pegged components that had been inserted by the remaining surgeons (p < 0.00001).

Conclusions: Perfectly cementing and seating a glenoid replacement is a difficult task. Radiolucencies and incomplete component seating occur more frequently in association with keeled components compared with pegged components. Surgeon experience may be an important variable in the achievement of a good technical outcome.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. Rahme, P. Mattsson, L. Wikblad, J. Nowak, and S. Larsson
Stability of Cemented in-Line Pegged Glenoid Compared with Keeled Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2009; 91(8): 1965 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
D. Cuff, D. Pupello, N. Virani, J. Levy, and M. Frankle
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Rotator Cuff Deficiency
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2008; 90(6): 1244 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. A. Matsen III, J. Clinton, J. Lynch, A. Bertelsen, and M. L. Richardson
Glenoid Component Failure in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., April 1, 2008; 90(4): 885 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
J. R. Lynch, A. K. Franta, W. H. Montgomery Jr, T. R. Lenters, D. Mounce, and F. A. Matsen III
Self-Assessed Outcome at Two to Four Years After Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty with Concentric Glenoid Reaming
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2007; 89(6): 1284 - 1292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. I. Bohsali, M. A. Wirth, and C. A. Rockwood Jr.
Complications of Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 2006; 88(10): 2279 - 2292.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
P. Boileau, R. J. Sinnerton, C. Chuinard, and G. Walch
Arthroplasty of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, May 1, 2006; 88-B(5): 562 - 575.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
J. F. Haines, I. A. Trail, D. Nuttall, A. Birch, and A. Barrow
The results of arthroplasty in osteoarthritis of the shoulder
J Bone Joint Surg Br, April 1, 2006; 88-B(4): 496 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
E. H. Yian, C. M.L. Werner, R. W. Nyffeler, C. W. Pfirrmann, A. Ramappa, A. Sukthankar, and C. Gerber
Radiographic and Computed Tomography Analysis of Cemented Pegged Polyethylene Glenoid Components in Total Shoulder Replacement
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 2005; 87(9): 1928 - 1936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C.M.L. Werner, P.A. Steinmann, M. Gilbart, and C. Gerber
Treatment of Painful Pseudoparesis Due to Irreparable Rotator Cuff Dysfunction with the Delta III Reverse-Ball-and-Socket Total Shoulder Prosthesis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2005; 87(7): 1476 - 1486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. S. Taljanovic, M. D. Jones, T. B. Hunter, J. B. Benjamin, J. T. Ruth, A. W. Brown, and J. E. Sheppard
Joint Arthroplasties and Prostheses
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2003; 23(5): 1295 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]