The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American) 84:945-950 (2002)
© 2002 The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Around Well-Fixed Implants:Use of Cortical Onlay Allografts with or without a Plate
Fares S. Haddad, BSc, FRCS(Orth),
Clive P. Duncan, MD, FRCS(C),
Daniel J. Berry, MD,
David G. Lewallen, MD,
Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCS(C) and
Hugh P. Chandler, MD
Investigation performed at Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver,
British Columbia, Canada; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota;Mount
Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada;
and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Fares S. Haddad, BSc, FRCS(Orth)
46b Hanover Gate Mansions, Park Road, London NW1 4SN, United
Kingdom. E-mail address: fareshaddad{at}compuserve.com
Clive P. Duncan, MD, FRCS(C)
Department of Orthopaedics, Pattison Pavilion North, Vancouver
General Hospital, 910 West Tenth Avenue, Room 3114, Vancouver, BC
V5Z 4E3, Canada
Daniel J. Berry, MD
David G. Lewallen, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street
S.W., Rochester, MN 55905
Allan E. Gross, MD, FRCS(C)
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, University
of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Suite 476A, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5,
Canada
Hugh P. Chandler, MD
Massachusetts General Hospital, Wang Ambulatory Care Center,
15 Parkman Street, Level 5, Boston, MA 02114
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from
a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject
of this article. One of the authors (F.S.H.) was supported by the
John Charnley and BOA (British Orthopaedic Association)/Wishbone
Trusts and by the Norman Capener Travelling Fellowship.
Background:
Periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements are increasingly
common. When the femoral component is stable, open reduction and
internal fixation is recommended in all but exceptional cases. The
purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of treatment of
fractures around stable implants with cortical onlay strut allografts
with or without a plate.
Methods:
A survey of our four centers identified forty patients with a fracture
around a well-fixed femoral stem treated with cortical onlay strut
allografts without revision of the femoral component. There were
fourteen men and twenty-six women, with an average age of sixty-nine
years. Nineteen patients were treated with cortical onlay strut
allografts alone, and twenty-one were managed with a plate and one
or two cortical struts. All of the patients were followed until
fracture union or until a reoperation was done. The mean duration
of follow-up was twenty-eight months for thirty-nine patients. One
patient, who was noncompliant with treatment recommendations, had
a failure at two months because of a fracture of the plate and graft.
The primary end point of the evaluation was fracture union; secondary
end points included strut-to-host bone union, the amount of final
bone stock, and postoperative function.
Results:
Thirty-nine (98%) of the forty fractures united, and strut-to-host
bone union was typically seen within the first year. There were
four malunions, all of which had <10° of malalignment,
and one deep infection. There was no evidence of femoral loosening
in any patient. All but one of the surviving patients returned to
their preoperative functional level within one year.
Conclusions:
Cortical onlay strut allografts act as biological bone plates, serving
both a mechanical and a biological function. The use of cortical
struts, either alone or in conjunction with a plate, led to a very
high rate of fracture union, satisfactory alignment, and an increase
in femoral bone stock at the time of short-term follow-up. Although
this study did not address the potential for later allograft remodeling,
our findings suggest that cortical strut grafts should be used routinely
to augment fixation and healing of a periprosthetic femoral fracture.

CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Zdero, R. Walker, J. P. Waddell, and E. H. Schemitsch
Biomechanical Evaluation of Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture Fixation
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2008;
90(5):
1068 - 1077.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Steinmann and E. V. Cheung
Treatment of Periprosthetic Humerus Fractures Associated With Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg.,
April 1, 2008;
16(4):
199 - 207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.A. Buttaro, G. Farfalli, M. P. Nunez, F. Comba, and F. Piccaluga
Locking Compression Plate Fixation of Vancouver Type-B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
September 1, 2007;
89(9):
1964 - 1969.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. G. De Long Jr., T. A. Einhorn, K. Koval, M. McKee, W. Smith, R. Sanders, and T. Watson
Bone Grafts and Bone Graft Substitutes in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery. A Critical Analysis
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
March 1, 2007;
89(3):
649 - 658.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Lindahl, G. Garellick, H. Regner, P. Herberts, and H. Malchau
Three Hundred and Twenty-one Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
June 1, 2006;
88(6):
1215 - 1222.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Maury, A. Pressman, B. Cayen, P. Zalzal, D. Backstein, and A. Gross
Proximal Femoral Allograft Treatment of Vancouver Type-B3 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures After Total Hip Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
May 1, 2006;
88(5):
953 - 958.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. M. Ricci, B. R. Bolhofner, T. Loftus, C. Cox, S. Mitchell, and J. Borrelli Jr.
Indirect Reduction and Plate Fixation, without Grafting, for Periprosthetic Femoral Shaft Fractures About a Stable Intramedullary Implant
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
October 1, 2005;
87(10):
2240 - 2245.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Parvizi, V. R. Rapuri, J. J. Purtill, P. F. Sharkey, R. H. Rothman, and W. J. Hozack
Treatment Protocol for Proximal Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.,
December 1, 2004;
86(suppl_2):
8 - 16.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|